The Hackensack Trust Co. v. Hart

61 A.2d 234, 142 N.J. Eq. 727
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 5, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Grimshaw, and reported at 141 N. J. Eq. 96.

~~ For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Bodine, Donges, Wachenfeld, Jacobs, Wells, Preund, McLean, JJ. 8.

For reversal — Heher, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Dill, Schettino, JJ. 6.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Hackensack Trust Co. v. Hart, 61 A.2d 234, 142 N.J. Eq. 727 (N.J. 1948).

61 A.2d 234 (The Hackensack Trust Co. v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BURLINGTON COUNTY NAT. BANK, MEDFORD v. Braddock
94 A.2d 868 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Hackensack Trust Co. v. Bogert
88 A.2d 14 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)