The H. C. Grady
84 F. 226, 1897 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111
Opinion
This suit having been consolidated with others against the steamer H. C. Grady, and final hearing in all of said actions having been had at the same time, but one proctor’s docket fee should be allowed in the cases represented by the same proctor. The Medusa, 47 Fed. 821. The exceptions to the action of the clerk in disallowing docket fee for proctor of said intervener are overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The H. C. Grady, 84 F. 226, 1897 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 111 (N.D. Cal. 1897).
84 F. 226 (The H. C. Grady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. New Departure Mfg. Co.
204 F. 107 (W.D. New York, 1913)
Boston Marine Ins. v. Metropolitan Redwood Lumber Co.
197 F. 703 (Ninth Circuit, 1912)
State v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.
126 N.W. 126 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)