The Greyhound Corp. v. Harold Rigel

297 F.2d 835
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 26, 1961
Docket16883_1
StatusPublished

This text of 297 F.2d 835 (The Greyhound Corp. v. Harold Rigel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Greyhound Corp. v. Harold Rigel, 297 F.2d 835 (8th Cir. 1961).

Opinion

297 F.2d 835

The GREYHOUND CORP. et al., Appellants
v.
Harold RIGEL.

No. 16883.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

December 26, 1961.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Lyle E. Strom and Harold L. Rock, Omaha, Neb., for appellant.

Robert D. Mullin and S. Bruce Barton, Omaha, Neb., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed with prejudice on stipulation of parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 F.2d 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-greyhound-corp-v-harold-rigel-ca8-1961.