The Gray Eagles, Inc v. Lucchesi
This text of 212 N.W.2d 749 (The Gray Eagles, Inc v. Lucchesi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE GRAY EAGLES, INC
v.
LUCCHESI
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Wisti & Jaaskelainen (by Phillip L. Kukkonen), for plaintiff.
McLean & McCarthy, for defendant.
Before: R.B. BURNS, P.J., and QUINN and O'HARA,[*] JJ.
PER CURIAM.
This case has been previously appealed *83 to this Court, The Gray Eagles, Inc v Lucchesi, 37 Mich App 322; 194 NW2d 373 (1971). The case was ordered, "Reversed and remanded for trial as to plaintiff's bailment theory of strict liability".[1] On retrial, the trial court ordered the trial limited to plaintiff's bailment theory of strict liability. Plaintiff's took this interlocutory appeal contending the reversal and remand was for a complete new trial, including plaintiff's negligence theory.
This is a recurring problem. It should be laid to rest. When an appellate court specifies the limits of a new trial as it did in this case, the trial court is proscribed from exceeding those specified limits.
The trial judge was correct. We affirm. Costs to the defendant.
NOTES
[*] Former Supreme Court Justice, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to Const 1963, art 6, § 23 as amended in 1968.
[1] The Gray Eagles, Inc v Lucchesi, 37 Mich App 322, 324; 194 NW2d 373, 374 (1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 N.W.2d 749, 50 Mich. App. 82, 1973 Mich. App. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-gray-eagles-inc-v-lucchesi-michctapp-1973.