The Grapeshot

Supreme Court

The Grapeshot

74 U.S. 563, 19 L. Ed. 83, 7 Wall. 563, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1034

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 25, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 U.S. 563 (The Grapeshot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Grapeshot, 74 U.S. 563, 19 L. Ed. 83, 7 Wall. 563, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1034 (1869).

Pincite

Opinion

*564 The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

The first motion to dismiss this appeal is made upon the ground that the transcript of the record is incomplete, because of the.omission of certain papers said to have been used in the court, below, but no't to be found wíien the trans- , eript was, made.

• The motion must be denied. Proqf that the papers alleged to be wanting were used in the court below, and have been lost, must be made by affidavit.. The certificate of the clerk who made the transcript cannot be received as..proper evidence of these facts. . ,

. • The other motioh is made upon the ground that the decree below was rendered by the Provisional Court of Louisiana, established by the military authority of the President, during the late rebellion, from which no appeal could,be properly taken.- But we find, on looking.into the statutes, that when the Provisional Court ceaséd to exist, its judgments and decrees were directed to be transferred into the Circuit Court, find to stand as the judgments and decrees of that court. And it is from the decree of the Circuit Court that the appeal under consideration was taken. As an appeal from that court it was regular, and the motion to'dismiss, must, be denied.

All• questions concerning the validity of judgments and decrees of the Provisional Court will remain open, until after final hearing. Motions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*564 The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered the opinion of the court.

The first motion to dismiss this appeal is made upon the ground that the transcript of the record is incomplete, because of the.omission of certain papers said to have been used in the court, below, but no't to be found wíien the trans- , eript was, made.

• The motion must be denied. Proqf that the papers alleged to be wanting were used in the court below, and have been lost, must be made by affidavit.. The certificate of the clerk who made the transcript cannot be received as..proper evidence of these facts. . ,

. • The other motioh is made upon the ground that the decree below was rendered by the Provisional Court of Louisiana, established by the military authority of the President, during the late rebellion, from which no appeal could,be properly taken.- But we find, on looking.into the statutes, that when the Provisional Court ceaséd to exist, its judgments and decrees were directed to be transferred into the Circuit Court, find to stand as the judgments and decrees of that court. And it is from the decree of the Circuit Court that the appeal under consideration was taken. As an appeal from that court it was regular, and the motion to'dismiss, must, be denied.

All• questions concerning the validity of judgments and decrees of the Provisional Court will remain open, until after final hearing. Motions denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 U.S. 563, 19 L. Ed. 83, 7 Wall. 563, 1868 U.S. LEXIS 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-grapeshot-scotus-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack