The Government of the Canal Zone v. Michael Joseph O'COnnOr

Fifth Circuit

The Government of the Canal Zone v. Michael Joseph O'COnnOr

460 F.2d 1004, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9117

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 8, 1972·No. 72-1112·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 498, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Richard M. Olsen, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521, and United States v. Crawford, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 498, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Richard M. Olsen, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F.2d 521, and United States v. Crawford, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1085.

The Government of the Canal Zone v. Michael Joseph O'COnnOr, 460 F.2d 1004, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9117 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

460 F.2d 1004 (The Government of the Canal Zone v. Michael Joseph O'COnnOr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related