The Gloucester

197 F. 655, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1472
CourtDistrict Court, D. Maryland
DecidedJune 21, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 197 F. 655 (The Gloucester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Gloucester, 197 F. 655, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1472 (D. Md. 1912).

Opinion

ROSE, District Judge.

This is a collision case. The vessels which came together were the steamship Gloucester and the four-masted schooner Herbert D. Maxwell. The former will be referred to as the steamer, the latter as the schooner.

The steamer was a vessel of 3,200 tons. It was about 295 feet long. It was on one of its regular voyages from Boston to Baltimore. The schooner was of 772 gross tons.' ' It was 176 feet long. ■Its breadth of beam was 48 feet. It was laden with about 1,150 tons .of fertilizer. It was bound from Baltimore to Wilmington, N. C. The timé of collision wás about 4:44 on the morning of March 16, 1912, the place a point in the Chesapeake Bay east, of slightly north of east, from the Bay Ridge Hotel and about northeast of Thomas Point Light. In this vicinity ships bound down ordinarily changed théir course somewhat to port; those bound up to starboard. There is no other external fact to suggest any cause for the collision. The navigable-waters- of-the bay were here upwards of two miles wide. Day had not yet broken, but it was a clear starlight night. The wind was from the west northwest anji blowing perhaps 15 knots an hour. The steamer’s bow struck the schooner’s starboard quarter almost 50 feet from the stern. The schooner was very nearly cut in two. It sank almost immediately. Four of the nine persons on board were lost. The mastér of the schooner, as master and managing owner, libele,d the steamer on behalf of himself, his crew, and his cO-owners. The Virginia-Carolina Chemical Company, as owner of the schooner’s cargo, took like action. Two libels were filed against the steamer by the state of Maryland on behalf of the dependent relatives of two of the schooner’s crew who perished in the disaster. At the time of the hearing it, was hoped, that the schooner might be raised. The Merchants’ & Miners’ Transportation Company, as owner of the steamer, accordingly, fi'lecj a cross-libel against the master and owners of the schooner. All these proceedings have been consolidated.

The lights of each vessel were burning brightly. The steamer was the burdened vessel. It must explain why it did not keep out of the schooner’s way. Its story may be briefly told. It first sighted the schooner when the latter was as yet a mile or more away. The steamer was.running between 13 and 14 knots an hour; the schooner between 5 and 6. They were approaching each other at a rate of very-nearly 20'miles, an hour. The collision must have happened in [657]*657a little over three minutes after the steamer first saw the schooner. At that time the schooner showed a red light a point on the steamer’s starboard bow. The first officer of the latter, whose watch it then was, told the quartermaster to port his helm “some.” This was at once done. The steamer continued under a port helm until the distance between the vessels, which may roughly be assumed to have been at first a nautical mile, or 6,080 feet, had been reduced to 5 or 6 ship lengths, or, say, 1,650 feet. The space dividing them had been cut down by 3,400 feet. As the steamer was going something more than twice as fast as the schooner, the steamer must have passed over in the meanwhile a distance of upwards of 2,400 feet, or about two-fifths of a statute mile. It must be remembered that all the while the steamer was under a port helm. When the helm was put aport, “some” the schooner was showing its red light a point on the steamer’s starboard bow. When the vessels were within five or six ship lengths of each other, the schooner’s red light was a point on the steamer’s port bow. The vessels were then showing red to red. The first officer of the steamer says that he thought he would give the schooner more room. He according^ had his helm put hard aport. If the vessels were then within 1,650 feet or thereabouts of each other as the witnesses for the steamer think, the collision must have taken place in about a minute. The effect of putting the steamer under a hard aport helm was to move the schooner’s red light apparently half a point farther to port. While the steamer’s stem was swinging under the influence of a hard aport helm farther to starboard — that is, to the eastward — those on its deck saw the schooner also swing over in the same direction, and change her red light to greén. The ships were then within two or three ship lengths of each other; that is, from 600 to 900 feet, say 750 feet. They must have come together within 25 seconds thereafter. The first officer of the steamer says, in effect, that he saw the danger of collision was imminent. He feared that if he continued under a hard aport helm the schooner would run into him, or perhaps he into it. If he attempted to reverse, the effect would be pretty much the same as if he had kept on under a hard aport helm. There was not time enough to check the steamer’s speed materially, and he feared if he attempted it he would increase the likelihood of the vessels colliding. He considered himself in extremis. He thought his best chance was to try to pass under the schooner’s stern. He accordingly ordered his helm hard astarboard. The collision followed. In short, the steamer says that, when the vessels were less than a quarter of a mile apart, the schooner changed its course, and started across the steamer s bow. If this be accepted as the true version of the accident, and of the causes leading up to it, the steamer cannot be blamed except for those things which it did or left undone after the schooner’s change of course became visible to it.

The schooner has a different story to tell. Before passing to it, however, it may be worth while to note the account which is given of the accident in the steamer’s log. The entries therein were made by the chief officer, the same man. who was in charge of the naviga[658]*658tion of the steamer at the time of the collision, and who was its principal witness. The log says:

■ “When about 2 miles North of Thomas Point sighted a sailing vessel about one point on our starboard bow showing a red light and heading well into the Westward. I then ordered my helm to port to show my red light and clear the vessel, when within a short distance from the vessel she star-boarded her helm and showed her green light, and within a few seconds the collision occurred we lowered a boat for the missing men on the schooner, which could not be found.”

Nothing is here said about the order to hard aport the steamer’s helm or about the subsequent order to hard astarboard. It would seem that at the time the first officer wrote up the log it did not happen to occur to him that he wished to make a record of such orders, if they were in fact given.

The schooner gives its account of what it did and saw. About 7 o’clock in the evening of March 15th the schooner left an anchorage off the mouth of the Magothy. About an hour later, and when it had gotten well over to the eastward of the bay and just below Sandy Point, the wind died down and it had again to anchor. This second anchorage appears to have been four or five miles from the place of collision. The wind having come up, the schooner’s captain, at about 3 in the morning, had the mate call all hands to get under way. The witnesses for the schooner say that it did get under way about 4. According to the steamer’s, it passed Thomas Point Tight at 4:32. If so the collision could not have happened before 4:44. It took the steamer about 4% minutes to go a mile. Thomas Point Tight is about 2ys miles below the place of collision. The latter could not have happened until 12 or 13 minutes after the steamer passed the light. The schooner was making a mile in 10 or 12 minutes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 F. 655, 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-gloucester-mdd-1912.