The Gillette Company v. Douglas B. Roberts Thomas M. Hoatlin
This text of 52 F.3d 325 (The Gillette Company v. Douglas B. Roberts Thomas M. Hoatlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 325
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
The GILLETTE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Douglas B. ROBERTS; Thomas M. Hoatlin, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-2022.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 19, 1995.
ORDER
The plaintiff appeals the dismissal of its action to enjoin Michigan officials from the collection of certain taxes assessed for the years 1976 through 1981. Now before the court is the plaintiff's motion to take judicial notice of matters which render the appeal moot, the defendants' response, and the plaintiff's reply. Having been advised that the taxes in question have been collected, the court concludes the matter is moot.
Therefore, the district court's judgment is VACATED. This appeal is REMANDED to the district court which is instructed to dismiss the complaint as moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 325, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17999, 1995 WL 234635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-gillette-company-v-douglas-b-roberts-thomas-m--ca6-1995.