The George Hill

Second Circuit

The George Hill

192 F. 1022, 112 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1984

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedFebruary 13, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 192 F. 1022 (The George Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The George Hill, 192 F. 1022, 112 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1984 (2d Cir. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant cannot. appear in forma pauperis in this court, as Act July 20, 1892, c. 209, 27 Stat. 252 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 706), does not apply to appellate courts. Bradford v. Railroad Co., 195 U. S. 243, 25 Sup. Ct. 55, 49 L. Ed. 178, The Presto (in admiralty) 93 Fed. 522, 35 C. C. A. 394. In view of the peculiar circumstances of this case, we think the bond required by rule 2 of this court (150 Fed. cxxxvl, 79 C. C. A cxxxvi) may be dispensed with. Appellant may also dispense with the printing of the record, and the court will hear the appeal upon a typewritten copy thereof. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant cannot. appear in forma pauperis in this court, as Act July 20, 1892, c. 209, 27 Stat. 252 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 706), does not apply to appellate courts. Bradford v. Railroad Co., 195 U. S. 243, 25 Sup. Ct. 55, 49 L. Ed. 178, The Presto (in admiralty) 93 Fed. 522, 35 C. C. A. 394. In view of the peculiar circumstances of this case, we think the bond required by rule 2 of this court (150 Fed. cxxxvl, 79 C. C. A cxxxvi) may be dispensed with. Appellant may also dispense with the printing of the record, and the court will hear the appeal upon a typewritten copy thereof. Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 F. 1022, 112 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-george-hill-ca2-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack