The General Tire & Rubber Company v. Isocyanate Products, Inc. Isocyanate Products, Inc. v. The General Tire and Rubber Company

391 F.2d 936, 157 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 353, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7296
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 1968
Docket16738
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 936 (The General Tire & Rubber Company v. Isocyanate Products, Inc. Isocyanate Products, Inc. v. The General Tire and Rubber Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The General Tire & Rubber Company v. Isocyanate Products, Inc. Isocyanate Products, Inc. v. The General Tire and Rubber Company, 391 F.2d 936, 157 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 353, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7296 (3d Cir. 1968).

Opinion

391 F.2d 936

157 U.S.P.Q. 353

The GENERAL TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC.
ISOCYANATE PRODUCTS, INC.
v.
The GENERAL TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, Appellant.

Nos. 16737, 16738.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued March 22, 1968.
Decided April 16, 1968.

John T. Kelton, Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, New York City (Connolly, Bove & Lodge, Wilmington, Del., Herbert Blecker, Thomas v. Heyman, John F. Banzhaf, III, New York City, Frank C. Rote, Akron Ohio, on the brief), for appellant in both cases (The General Tire and Rubber Co.)

C. Walter Mortenson, Mortenson & Weigel, Wilmington, Del. (Charles A. Weigel, Jr., Washington, D.C., Virgil E. Woodcock, John J. Mackiewicz, Woodcock, Phelan & Washburn, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Isocyanate Products, Inc. and Murphy Body Works, Inc.

Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On a full consideration of the arguments of appellant we are satisfied that the district court acted within the allowable range of its discretion. The reasoning expressed in its opinion, reported at 270 F.Supp. 868 (D.Del.1967), fully justifies the conclusion that its discretion was wisely exercised.

The judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
439 F. Supp. 625 (D. Rhode Island, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 F.2d 936, 157 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 353, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-general-tire-rubber-company-v-isocyanate-products-inc-isocyanate-ca3-1968.