The First National Bank of Miami v. Davis

8 So. 2d 403, 150 Fla. 673, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1051
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 29, 1942
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 So. 2d 403 (The First National Bank of Miami v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The First National Bank of Miami v. Davis, 8 So. 2d 403, 150 Fla. 673, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1051 (Fla. 1942).

Opinion

BUFORD, J.:

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to test the legality of the judgment of the circuit court affirming a judgment of the Civil Court of Record of Dade County.

The declaration was in one count, as follows:

“Said defendant became and was prior to the institution of this suit and still is justly indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and seventy-five *674 dollars ($475.00), together with interest from August 24th, 1940, money payable by the defendant to the plaintiff for money received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff.
“And being so indebted the defendant in consideration thereof then and there promised to pay to the plaintiff on request the said several sums of money; yet, the said defendant though often requested has not paid the same or any part thereof to the plaintiff but refuses so to do.
“Wherefore, plaintiff sues the defendant and claims damages in the sum of one thousand dollars ($1000.00) .”

To the declaration there was interposed a single plea of never was indebted as alleged.

The proof showed that plaintiff, being a depositor in defendant bank, issued his check against his account in the said bank in the sum of $475.00, but, before said check was presented to said bank, plaintiff ordered said bank not to pay the check; that after receiving plaintiff’s order not to pay the check the bank disregarded the order, paid the check and deducted the amount thereof from plaintiff’s account.

No plea of subrogation, of counter-claim, or of set-off or of recoupment was interposed. Under the pleadings and proof, judgment was properly entered for plaintiff. •

Writ of certiorari is denied.

So ordered.

BROWN, C; J„ WHITFIELD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooke v. Commercial Bank of Miami
119 So. 2d 732 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 So. 2d 403, 150 Fla. 673, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-first-national-bank-of-miami-v-davis-fla-1942.