The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Sixth Circuit

The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations Board

533 F.2d 336, 92 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3184, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11789

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 15, 1976

Docket75-1673

StatusPublished

This text of 533 F.2d 336 (The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 533 F.2d 336, 92 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3184, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11789 (6th Cir. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of Firestone’s petition for review and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement, we are of the opinion that the Board erred in denying Firestone an evidentiary hearing on its objections to the election on the ground that the union on the eve of the election made misrepresentations to employees that it had negotiated provisions in its contract permitting security guards to transfer into production positions and to return to their positions as guards if they did not like the job into which they had been transferred.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Board’s order be vacated and the cause remanded to the Board for an evidentiary hearing on said issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of Firestone’s petition for review and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement, we are of the opinion that the Board erred in denying Firestone an evidentiary hearing on its objections to the election on the ground that the union on the eve of the election made misrepresentations to employees that it had negotiated provisions in its contract permitting security guards to transfer into production positions and to return to their positions as guards if they did not like the job into which they had been transferred.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Board’s order be vacated and the cause remanded to the Board for an evidentiary hearing on said issue.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

533 F.2d 336, 92 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3184, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-firestone-tire-and-rubber-company-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1976.