The Evansville

13 F. Supp. 555, 1935 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1119
District Court, S.D. Texas·Decided October 24, 1935·No. No. 356·Published

Opinion

KENNERLY, District Judge.

This is a proceeding in rem by libel-ant against the steamship Evansville to recover wages; libelant having been master of such steamship. Under Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co. v. Foster (C.C.A.) 31 F.(2d) 394, Foster v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co., 280 U.S. 555, 50 S.Ct. 16, 74 L.Ed. 611, and Warner v. Goltra, 293 U.S. 155, 55 S.Ct. 46, 79 L.Ed. 254, I think a master has no maritime lien for wages. It is not shown in this case that libelant has a lien under the laws of Texas.

Since libelant has no lien, this proceeding in rem may not be maintained, and it will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Evansville, 13 F. Supp. 555, 1935 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1119 (S.D. Tex. 1935).

13 F. Supp. 555 (The Evansville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warner v. Goltra
293 U.S. 155 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co. v. Foster
31 F.2d 394 (Fifth Circuit, 1929)
Foster v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co.
280 U.S. 555 (Supreme Court, 1929)