The Eugenia Emilia

298 F. 340, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1632, 1924 A.M.C. 538
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedFebruary 8, 1924
DocketNo. 2380
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 298 F. 340 (The Eugenia Emilia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Eugenia Emilia, 298 F. 340, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1632, 1924 A.M.C. 538 (D. Mass. 1924).

Opinion

LOWELL, District Judge.

This vessel was forfeited to the United States for illegal importation of cocaine and intoxicating liquor. There are several claimants, including the United States of America, to the proceeds in the registry arising from the sale of the vessel. I rule that the materialmen and those advancing money or furnishing services have a right to this fund prior to the claim of the United States. The St. Jago de Cuba, 9 Wheat. 409, 6 L. Ed. 122; North American Commercial Co. v. U. S., 81 Fed. 748, 26 C. C. A. 591.

It is admitted that Capt. Hammett should receive $50 for the use of his chronometer. This sum I allow. I refuse him any further compensation. The Nebraska, 75 Fed. 598, 21 C. C. A. 448. While it is true that under certain circumstances a master is given a lien when the owner is on board, as he was in the case at bar, I do not think that the present case is one where an exception to the general rule should be made.

Certain claims for nonmaritime services or expenses are refused. These include a claim by the immigration commissioner for expenses in deporting aliens who were wrongfully brought over on the vessel, aand also a claim of the New Bedford Storage Warehouse Company for the rent of a hall. The other claims for services, advances, or supplies will be allowed in the reverse order of their rendition. Hughes, Admiralty (2d Ed.) p. 391.

I am in doubt as to the dates of the furnishing by the other claimants of their services, advances, or supplies. The case may1 be sent to a master to determine the priorities of the remaining claimants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bard v. the Silver Wave
98 F. Supp. 271 (D. Maryland, 1951)
Jackman v. United States
54 F.2d 227 (First Circuit, 1931)
The Thomaston
26 F.2d 279 (D. Maryland, 1928)
The Minnie V.
24 F.2d 604 (D. Massachusetts, 1927)
The Mariner
298 F. 108 (D. Massachusetts, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
298 F. 340, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1632, 1924 A.M.C. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-eugenia-emilia-mad-1924.