the Estate of Donna Catherine MacDonald Diana MacDonald, Individually Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Ruth Jones MacDonald Material Deduction Trust Under the Will of R.D. MacDonald, Jr. Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Diana Moore Residuary Trust v. Reeder Road SAF-T-LOC, LLC

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 15, 2016
Docket05-16-00960-CV
StatusPublished

This text of the Estate of Donna Catherine MacDonald Diana MacDonald, Individually Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Ruth Jones MacDonald Material Deduction Trust Under the Will of R.D. MacDonald, Jr. Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Diana Moore Residuary Trust v. Reeder Road SAF-T-LOC, LLC (the Estate of Donna Catherine MacDonald Diana MacDonald, Individually Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Ruth Jones MacDonald Material Deduction Trust Under the Will of R.D. MacDonald, Jr. Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Diana Moore Residuary Trust v. Reeder Road SAF-T-LOC, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
the Estate of Donna Catherine MacDonald Diana MacDonald, Individually Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Ruth Jones MacDonald Material Deduction Trust Under the Will of R.D. MacDonald, Jr. Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Diana Moore Residuary Trust v. Reeder Road SAF-T-LOC, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Order entered August 15, 2016

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00960-CV

THE ESTATE OF DONNA CATHERINE MACDONALS, ET AL., Appellants

V.

REEDER ROAD SAF-T-LOC, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-11296

ORDER We are in receipt of Appellants’ August 9, 2016 Notice of Appeal in which they appeal

an interlocutory order pursuant to TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 51.014(a)(4) and request in

the alternative for the Court to treat the appeal as an original proceeding should the Court

determine the order appealed from is not a temporary mandatory injunction. We have

preliminarily determined that the order is subject to interlocutory appeal pursuant to section

51.014(a)(4) and will be treated as an interlocutory appeal. The submissions panel may revisit

this determination at the time of submission and consider the appeal at that time as a petition for

writ of mandamus without prejudice to appellants. See CMH Homes v. Perez, 340 S.W.3d 444,

454 (Tex. 2011) (ordering court of appeals to treat dismissed interlocutory appeal as mandamus

proceeding); Icon Benefit Administrators II, L.P. v. Mullin, 405 S.W.3d 257, 263 (Tex. App.—

1 Dallas 2013, no pet.) (treating appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus per CMH Homes). The

appellate record is due to be filed by August 19, 2016. TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1(b).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
the Estate of Donna Catherine MacDonald Diana MacDonald, Individually Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Ruth Jones MacDonald Material Deduction Trust Under the Will of R.D. MacDonald, Jr. Compass Bank, as Trustee of the Diana Moore Residuary Trust v. Reeder Road SAF-T-LOC, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-estate-of-donna-catherine-macdonald-diana-macdonald-individually-texapp-2016.