The Estate of B.H., et al. v. Netflix, Inc.

Opinion

1 2 5 6 THE ESTATE OF B.H., et al., Case No. 4:21-cv-06561-YGR 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 8 v. Defendant. 10 1]

2 On November 10, 2025, the Court issued an order affirming its subject matter jurisdiction

13 in this case. (Dkt. No. 116.) The parties were directed to submit statements regarding the next

14 steps, if any, in the litigation, which the Court received on November 20, 2025. (Dkt. Nos. 117, — 15 118.) The Court has reviewed the position statements and agrees with Netflix’s logic that the A 16 appropriate next step is the entry of judgment in favor of Netflix. While the events of this case are

M7 undisputedly tragic, the Court remains bound to follow the law. The Court may not exceed the Oo a 18 scope of the Ninth Circuit’s remand order. Alaska Dep’t of Fish & Game v. Fed. Subsistence Bd., 19 139 F.4th 773, 789 (9th Cir. 2025). Accordingly, the Court reaffirms its order, and judgment will 20 follow. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 . Dated: November 25, 2025 24 VONNE GONZATEZ ROGERS 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28