The Empire State

8 F. Cas. 686, 2 Ben. 178
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1869
DocketCase No. 4,473
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 F. Cas. 686 (The Empire State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Empire State, 8 F. Cas. 686, 2 Ben. 178 (E.D.N.Y. 1869).

Opinion

BENEDIOT, District Judge.

Under the decision of the supreme court in the case of The Catharine, 17 How. [58 U. S.] 170, the rule adopted by the commissioner of ascertaining the damage by a reference to the cost of repair, instead of the result of the sale of the vessel before repairs, was correct But from the cost of repairs should be deducted the value of anchors, sails, rigging, boat, &c., which were not injured or sold, and which are included in the amount reported; while, on the other hand, there should be added the sum of $300, that being the proved value of the time of the person engaged in superintending the repairs. Aside from these items, the report appears to me to be correct, under the rule given by the case of The Catharine, which is there laid down as a positive rule, without exception. As to interest, it would seem that it must be allowed upon oie value-of the cargo and freight

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Cumberland
135 F. 234 (D. Massachusetts, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. Cas. 686, 2 Ben. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-empire-state-nyed-1869.