The EDGERRIN JAMES REV LIV TR/ EDGERRIN JAMES TTEE U/A v. CARLOS NEAL

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 28, 2024
DocketA23A1642
StatusPublished

This text of The EDGERRIN JAMES REV LIV TR/ EDGERRIN JAMES TTEE U/A v. CARLOS NEAL (The EDGERRIN JAMES REV LIV TR/ EDGERRIN JAMES TTEE U/A v. CARLOS NEAL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The EDGERRIN JAMES REV LIV TR/ EDGERRIN JAMES TTEE U/A v. CARLOS NEAL, (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 28, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A1642. THE EDGERRIN JAMES REV LIV TR/ EDGERRIN JAMES TTEE U/A v. CARLOS NEAL et al.

In March 2022, the Edgerrin James REV LIV TR/Edgerrin James TTEE U/A (“the James Trust”) filed a petition for writ of certiorari in superior court, seeking review of a judgment entered in state court. On August 26, 2022, the superior court dismissed the petition for writ of certiorari. The James Trust filed both a notice of appeal and a motion for new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. On November 1, 2022, the superior court dismissed the motion for new trial, finding that the filing of the notice of appeal divested it of jurisdiction. On December 1, 2022, the James Trust filed a discretionary application in this Court, challenging the trial court’s dismissal of its petition for writ of certiorari and motion for new trial, which this Court denied. See Case No. A23D0163 (Dec. 27, 2022). In this direct appeal, the James Trust again seeks to challenge the dismissal of its petition for writ of certiorari and motion for new trial.1 Our denial of the James Trust’s discretionary application was a decision on the merits, and the doctrine of res judicata bars any subsequent appeals from the same trial

1 The James Trust has filed several additional notices of appeal, but the only orders it challenges in its brief are the superior court’s orders dismissing its petition for writ of certiorari and its motion for new trial. See Low v. Swift, 367 Ga. App. 874, 876 (889 SE2d 122) (2023) (“the proper appellate procedure is determined by the issue raised in the appeal”). court orders. See Northwest Social & Civic Club v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 260-261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). Because the James Trust already challenged the trial court’s dismissal of its petition for writ of certiorari and motion for new trial in its discretionary application in Case No. A23D0163, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/28/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Northwest Social and Civic Club, Inc. v. Franklin
583 S.E.2d 858 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Hook v. Bergen
649 S.E.2d 313 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The EDGERRIN JAMES REV LIV TR/ EDGERRIN JAMES TTEE U/A v. CARLOS NEAL, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-edgerrin-james-rev-liv-tr-edgerrin-james-ttee-ua-v-carlos-neal-gactapp-2024.