The Edgar Baxter
8 F. Cas. 303, 8 Ben. 162
Opinion
The evidence shows that the movements of the propeller were under the direction of a pilot who was on board of, and belonged to, and was in the employ of, the schooner. The tug furnished only the motive power, while the guidance of the two vessels, considered as one in their relations to other vessels, the schooner being lashed alongside of the tug, was under the direction of the schooner, through such pilot. Under those circumstances, the tug is not liable for the damage complained of in this case, and the libel must be dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Edgar Baxter, 8 F. Cas. 303, 8 Ben. 162 (S.D.N.Y. 1875).
8 F. Cas. 303 (The Edgar Baxter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The Barranca
20 F.2d 192 (E.D. Louisiana, 1927)
The Gallia
196 F. 509 (S.D. New York, 1910)
In re Walsh
136 F. 557 (Fifth Circuit, 1905)