The E. C. Scranton

8 F. Cas. 296, 4 Ben. 127
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 15, 1870·No. Case No. 4,272·Published

Opinion

BEATCHFORD, District Judge.

The exception is disallowed. The question of the propriety of the action of the commissioner, in refusing to allow a person to be sworn to contradict testimony previously given, cannot be raised by an exception to the report of the commissioner. It ought to have been raised by an application to the court, before the report was made, to direct the commissioner to allow the person to be sworn. The Columbus [Case No. 3,041]; Tyler v. Simmons, 6 Paige, 127; Schwarz v. Sears, Walk[297] er, Ch. 19; Ward v. Jewett, Id. 45; Troy Iron & Nail Factory v. Corning [Case No. 14,196].

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The E. C. Scranton, 8 F. Cas. 296, 4 Ben. 127 (S.D.N.Y. 1870).

8 F. Cas. 296 (The E. C. Scranton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tyler v. Simmons
6 Paige Ch. 127 (New York Court of Chancery, 1836)