The Dow Chemical Company v. Organik Kimya Holdings, A.S.
Opinion
COURT OF CHANCERY
OF THE
SAM GLASSCOCK III STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947
Date Submitted: March 9, 2018 Date Decided: March 16, 2018
Rodger D. Smith II, Esquire Kathleen Furey McDonough, Esquire Ryan D. Stottmann, Esquire John A. Sensing, Esquire Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP Ryan C. Cicoski, Esquire 1201 North Market Street Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Hercules Plaza, Sixth Floor 1313 North Market Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Re: The Dow Chemical Company et al. v. Organik Kimya Holdings, A.S. et al., Civil Action No. 12090-VCG
Dear Counsel:
For the reasons stated at the conclusion of oral argument on March 9, 2018,
the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Discovery is granted and the discovery stay is
lifted.
To the extent the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO
ORDERED.
Sincerely,
/s/ Sam Glasscock III
Sam Glasscock III
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Dow Chemical Company v. Organik Kimya Holdings, A.S. (The Dow Chemical Company v. Organik Kimya Holdings, A.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.