The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Sixth Circuit

The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

659 F.2d 724, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18445

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedAugust 17, 1981

Docket79-1491

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 659 F.2d 724 (The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 659 F.2d 724, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18445 (6th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On receipt and consideration of an appeal by Appellant Dow Chemical Company from a judgment dismissing its complaint filed in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan seeking declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, or in the alternative, a writ of mandamus against Costle, Administrator of the E.P.A., and on review of the Opinion of District Judge James Harvey dated July 5, 1978, 480 F.Supp. 315, and the Judgment and Amended Judgment filed July 7 and July 12 respectively in the same year which dismissed said complaint for lack of jurisdiction, said *725 Judgment of July 12, 1978 is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the above-cited Opinion. See Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Costle, 572 F.2d 1349, 1353 (9th Cir. 1978); see also Dow Chemical Co. v. U. S. EPA and Costle, 635 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 3082, 69 L.Ed.2d 953 (1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On receipt and consideration of an appeal by Appellant Dow Chemical Company from a judgment dismissing its complaint filed in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan seeking declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, or in the alternative, a writ of mandamus against Costle, Administrator of the E.P.A., and on review of the Opinion of District Judge James Harvey dated July 5, 1978, 480 F.Supp. 315, and the Judgment and Amended Judgment filed July 7 and July 12 respectively in the same year which dismissed said complaint for lack of jurisdiction, said *725 Judgment of July 12, 1978 is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the above-cited Opinion. See Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Costle, 572 F.2d 1349, 1353 (9th Cir. 1978); see also Dow Chemical Co. v. U. S. EPA and Costle, 635 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 3082, 69 L.Ed.2d 953 (1981).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

659 F.2d 724, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-dow-chemical-company-a-delaware-corporation-v-douglas-m-costle-ca6-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack