The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Sixth Circuit

The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

659 F.2d 724, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18445

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 17, 1981·No. 79-1491·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

On receipt and consideration of an appeal by Appellant Dow Chemical Company from a judgment dismissing its complaint filed in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan seeking declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, or in the alternative, a writ of mandamus against Costle, Administrator of the E.P.A., and on review of the Opinion of District Judge James Harvey dated July 5, 1978, 480 F.Supp. 315, and the Judgment and Amended Judgment filed July 7 and July 12 respectively in the same year which dismissed said complaint for lack of jurisdiction, said *725 Judgment of July 12, 1978 is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the above-cited Opinion. See Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Costle, 572 F.2d 1349, 1353 (9th Cir. 1978); see also Dow Chemical Co. v. U. S. EPA and Costle, 635 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 3082, 69 L.Ed.2d 953 (1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On receipt and consideration of an appeal by Appellant Dow Chemical Company from a judgment dismissing its complaint filed in the U. S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan seeking declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, or in the alternative, a writ of mandamus against Costle, Administrator of the E.P.A., and on review of the Opinion of District Judge James Harvey dated July 5, 1978, 480 F.Supp. 315, and the Judgment and Amended Judgment filed July 7 and July 12 respectively in the same year which dismissed said complaint for lack of jurisdiction, said *725 Judgment of July 12, 1978 is hereby affirmed for the reasons set forth in the above-cited Opinion. See Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Costle, 572 F.2d 1349, 1353 (9th Cir. 1978); see also Dow Chemical Co. v. U. S. EPA and Costle, 635 F.2d 559 (6th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 3082, 69 L.Ed.2d 953 (1981).

The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, 659 F.2d 724, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18445 (6th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

659 F.2d 724 (The Dow Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related