The Douro

70 U.S. 564
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 15, 1865·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The CHIEF JUSTICE

delivered tlie opinion of the court.

The decree of the District Court in this cause is affirmed. -It is impossible to imagine a plainer case for condemnation for breach of blockade. The statements of the captain as to breaking the blockade are explicit, and the mate says substantially the same thing as he does.

We cannot approve the conduct of the counsel who advised this appeal. An appeal is a matter of right, and, if prayed, must be allowed; but should never be prayed without some expectation of reversal. We impose penalties when writs of error merely for delay are sued out, in cases of judgments at law for damages; and if the rule were applicable to the ease before us we should apply it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Douro, 70 U.S. 564 (1865).

70 U.S. 564 (The Douro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The Douro
70 U.S. 564 (Supreme Court, 1866)