The Do

9 F.2d 396, 1926 A.M.C. 496
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedNovember 21, 1925
DocketNo. 1715
StatusPublished

This text of 9 F.2d 396 (The Do) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Do, 9 F.2d 396, 1926 A.M.C. 496 (S.D. Fla. 1925).

Opinion

CALL, District Judge.

In this ease the libel is based on the alleged violation of two sections, 581 and 584, of the Tariff Act of 1922 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923,' §§ 5841h, 5841h3), and importing certain liquors without a permit so to do.

The only evidence to support these charges is that, when -boarded, the boat was [397]*397tied to the hank, no one aboard, and one sack of foreign liquor was found aboard, and some other sacks of liquor were recovered, by diving, from the water near the boat. This, it seems to me, is not sufficient proof upon which the court can predicate a decree for forfeiture or penalties.

The libel will be, therefore, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F.2d 396, 1926 A.M.C. 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-do-flsd-1925.