The Dial Corporation v. Carter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in The Dial Corporation v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 869 F.3d 13
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided August 10, 2017·No. 17-8009E·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 17-8009

MICHELLE CARTER; JONATHAN CESSNA; ALICIA GENTILE; SONIA HERRERA; JENNY MARAZZI; MEGAN PETERSON; SVEN P. VOGTLAND; DAVID WALLS; KRISTINA PEARSON; ERIC TERRELL; ELIZABETH POYNTER; ERIC CAPDEVILLE,

Plaintiffs, Respondents,

MICHAEL FEUER; MARTIN HOMMEL; KAMI RALEIGH; BRIDGET BECNEL DELIVORIAS; KAREN FINNEY; AMANI EL-JANDALI; MARVIN CATALAN,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE DIAL CORPORATION, a/k/a, Dial Corporation, a/k/a, The Dial Corporation, Inc.,

Defendant, Petitioner,

HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS, INC.,

Defendant.

ERRATA SHEET

The judgment of this Court issued on July 31, 2017, is amended as follows:

On page 2, line 31, insert a period after "Nexium."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Dial Corporation v. Carter, (1st Cir. 2017).

The Dial Corporation v. Carter (The Dial Corporation v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.