The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.

D. Kansas

The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.

DecidedFebruary 24, 2020

Docket2:17-cv-02614

StatusUnknown

This text of The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation. (The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation., (D. Kan. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN RE SYNGENTA AG MIR162 CORN LITIGATION Master File No. 2:14-MD-02591-JWL- JPO THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: MDL No. 2591 The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG, et al., No. 2:17-cv-02614-JWL- JPO

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Pending before the court is the parties’ consent motion to extend certain pre-trial scheduling deadlines, in which plaintiff The DeLong Co., Inc. (“DeLong”), with consent of defendants Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, and Syngenta Seeds, LLC (together, “Syngenta”), request a two-week extension to the pre-trial scheduling deadlines for fact discovery, all deadlines related to experts and Daubert motions, and dispositive motion briefing. The undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge, James P. O’Hara, finds good cause to enter the amended schedule proposed by the parties. It is therefore ordered that the motion is GRANTED. The court therefore enters the following amended scheduling order, amending certain dates set forth in the parties’ original scheduling order (ECF No. 11). Amendments are noted in bold, all other deadlines remain unchanged: SUMMARY OF DEADLINES AND SETTINGS

DEADLINE/SETTING Initial Disclosures By Plaintiff and 21 Days after entry of Supplemental Disclosures by Defendants this Scheduling Order 21 Days after entry of Deadline to Respond to Complaint this Scheduling Order 28 Days after the If a motion to dismiss is filed, Deadline for filing of any Motion Plaintiff to File Opposition to Dismiss 14 Days after the If a motion to dismiss is filed, Deadline for filing of any Defendants to File Reply Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 14 Days after Court rules on Syngenta’s Start of Fact Discovery Motion to Dismiss, or September 13, 2019 (whichever is earlier) Motions to amend November 1, 2019 Comparative fault identification October 11, 2019 Deadline for Fact Discovery March 27, 2020 Joint Waiver of Right to Transfer to the Western District of Wisconsin as permitted by Lexecon March 20, 20201 Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (1998) Experts disclosed by plaintiff March 27, 2020 Discovery from plaintiff’s experts May 1, 2020

1 See ECF No. 45. SUMMARY OF DEADLINES AND SETTINGS

DEADLINE/SETTING Experts disclosed by defendants May 29, 2020 Discovery from defendants’ experts July 3, 2020 July 10, 2020, at 9 Pretrial conference a.m. Proposed pretrial order due June 26, 2020 Daubert motions August 7, 2020 Dispositive motions August 14, 2020 Daubert oppositions September 4, 2020 Dispositive motion oppositions September 11, 2020 Daubert replies September 25, 2020 Dispositive motion replies October 2, 2020 Trial in the District of Kansas (if Lexecon February 16, 2021 waiver filed) 10 days after last Motion to Transfer for Trial to Western District order disposing of of Wisconsin (if no Lexecon waiver filed) Daubert and Dispositive Motions

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated February 24, 2020, at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ James P. O’Hara James P. O’Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN RE SYNGENTA AG MIR162 CORN LITIGATION Master File No. 2:14-MD-02591-JWL- JPO THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: MDL No. 2591 The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG, et al., No. 2:17-cv-02614-JWL- JPO

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Pending before the court is the parties’ consent motion to extend certain pre-trial scheduling deadlines, in which plaintiff The DeLong Co., Inc. (“DeLong”), with consent of defendants Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, and Syngenta Seeds, LLC (together, “Syngenta”), request a two-week extension to the pre-trial scheduling deadlines for fact discovery, all deadlines related to experts and Daubert motions, and dispositive motion briefing. The undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge, James P. O’Hara, finds good cause to enter the amended schedule proposed by the parties. It is therefore ordered that the motion is GRANTED. The court therefore enters the following amended scheduling order, amending certain dates set forth in the parties’ original scheduling order (ECF No. 11). Amendments are noted in bold, all other deadlines remain unchanged: SUMMARY OF DEADLINES AND SETTINGS

DEADLINE/SETTING Initial Disclosures By Plaintiff and 21 Days after entry of Supplemental Disclosures by Defendants this Scheduling Order 21 Days after entry of Deadline to Respond to Complaint this Scheduling Order 28 Days after the If a motion to dismiss is filed, Deadline for filing of any Motion Plaintiff to File Opposition to Dismiss 14 Days after the If a motion to dismiss is filed, Deadline for filing of any Defendants to File Reply Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 14 Days after Court rules on Syngenta’s Start of Fact Discovery Motion to Dismiss, or September 13, 2019 (whichever is earlier) Motions to amend November 1, 2019 Comparative fault identification October 11, 2019 Deadline for Fact Discovery March 27, 2020 Joint Waiver of Right to Transfer to the Western District of Wisconsin as permitted by Lexecon March 20, 20201 Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (1998) Experts disclosed by plaintiff March 27, 2020 Discovery from plaintiff’s experts May 1, 2020

1 See ECF No. 45. SUMMARY OF DEADLINES AND SETTINGS

DEADLINE/SETTING Experts disclosed by defendants May 29, 2020 Discovery from defendants’ experts July 3, 2020 July 10, 2020, at 9 Pretrial conference a.m. Proposed pretrial order due June 26, 2020 Daubert motions August 7, 2020 Dispositive motions August 14, 2020 Daubert oppositions September 4, 2020 Dispositive motion oppositions September 11, 2020 Daubert replies September 25, 2020 Dispositive motion replies October 2, 2020 Trial in the District of Kansas (if Lexecon February 16, 2021 waiver filed) 10 days after last Motion to Transfer for Trial to Western District order disposing of of Wisconsin (if no Lexecon waiver filed) Daubert and Dispositive Motions

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated February 24, 2020, at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ James P. O’Hara James P. O’Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

The Delong Co., Inc. v. Syngenta AG <b><font color="red"> REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.</font></b>, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-delong-co-inc-v-syngenta-ag-bfont-colorred-reminder-to-ksd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack