The Cypromene

135 F. 558, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 324
CourtDistrict Court, D. Oregon
DecidedFebruary 24, 1905
DocketNo. 4,646
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 F. 558 (The Cypromene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Cypromene, 135 F. 558, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 324 (D. Or. 1905).

Opinion

BELLINGER, District Judge.

This is a suit upon the libel of the Oregon Railroad & Navigation Company against the ship Cypromene, and the cross-libel of the owners of the ship, for damages caused by a collision between the ship and the company’s steamer Hassalo, while the former was at anchor in the Columbia river, on the Oregon side, a short distance below Kalama. The accident occurred on the 5th day of October, 1902. On the preceding day the company’s towboat the Oklahoma proceeded, with the Cypromene in tow, from Portland to Astoria, the company having engaged to tow the ship to the latter place. At about 7 p. m. of that day, October 4th, the Cypromene anchored in the Columbia river between Coffin Rock and Kalama, under the direction of the master of the tugboat, in the place and in the manner designated by him. This place of anchorage was a usual and customary place of anchorage for vessels bound from Portland to Astoria. As night came on, the proper and usual riding lights, consisting of white lights in the mizzen rigging and fore rigging, were displayed upon the ship. Shortly after 1 o’clock in the morning of the 5th, the company’s steamer Hassalo, while on her way from Portland to Astoria, and while in or near her usual course, collided with the ship, to the injury and damage of both vessels.

It is alleged by the navigation company that, at the time of the collision and prior thereto, there was a light wind upstream; that the Cypromene was enveloped in a thick bank of fog, extending downstream from a point a short distance above the ship; that the weather was a little hazy, and the fog bank was so obscured that those in command of the Hassalo were not aware of its existence; that when the steamer entered this bank of fog her pilot and captain saw a light about one point on her port bow, and immediately thereafter the jib boom of the Cypromene appeared in the fog directly in front of the pilot house of the Hassalo, and the collision occurred before any measures could be taken by the latter’s officers to avert it. The company alleges that the collision was caused by the gross negligence of the ship’s officers and crew in failing to have any lookout or anchor watch on the deck of the ship, or to ring a bell during the period and at the intervals required by law in such cases, or to give warning of the position of the ship by the use of a lighted torch, or by shouting, or by taking any other means to acquaint those in charge of the Hassalo with the position of the ship, and that it was impossible to perceive the latter’s position until too late to avoid a collision.

On behalf of the Cypromene, it is denied that the ship was at the time of the collision obscured by fog, or that there was any fog in her vicinity. It is admitted that no bell was rung on the ship, and that [560]*560no warning was given of her position, by shouting or by a lighted torch, but it is alleged that under the circumstances these precautions were not required, and that the Hassalo could not have been better apprised of the ship’s position than by the regulation anchor lights that were burning brightly at and prior to the collision, and it is denied that such lights were in any manner obscured. It is denied that the Hassalo was proceeding at the time of the collision at a moderate rate of speed, but, on the contrary, it is alleged that she was being navigated at full speed, and it is alleged that she is a fast boat, and that the collision occurred solely by reason of the negligence and want of care of the Hassalo in failing to observe the lights of the Cypromene, and by reason of her improper navigation, and of the failure to keep a lookout and watch as required by law.

The master of the steamer Fannie, Capt. Copeland, testifying for the libelant, says that he passed Kalama with his boat going down the river about 11 o’clock, possibly a little later, on the night of October 4th. When he reached a point about halfway between Kalama and Kalama River Point he struck a very thick bank of fog, which he had not seen before. He took his bearings, ran to Kalama River Point, got the echo from some trees there, turned around, and made his way to Farr’s Dock on the Oregon side, probably some 1,500 or 2,000 feet above where the ship was anchored. The Fannie had much difficulty in landing because of the fog, but was finally, at about 20 minutes or half past eleven, tied up at a dock at Neer City some 250 feet above Farr’s Dock. The fog continued dense down the river; above it was lighter. Saw the lights of the Hassalo dimly as she passed down the river, at a distance of between three and five hundred feet, and heard the crash of the collision and looked downstream, but could see no lights.

Sullivan, master of the Hassalo, testifies that the Hassalo’s speed is about 15 miles an hour, and she was running at full speed when the collision occurred; that there was no lookout on'the steamer at the time of the collision; at the time the testimony was taken the company had a man detailed to act as lookout. Knew that the Cypromene was at anchor somewhere down the river. Her captain was on board the Hassalo, and had requested the master of the latter to put him on board the Cypromene. Was expecting to find the latter at Doublebarrs Shoal or at Rainier. He testifies that Coffin Rock is an unusual place to anchor a loaded ship; that they do anchor light ships there. He and his pilot, Barton, were in the wheelhouse of the Hassalo at the time of the collision. They had been talking about the landings to be made. Capt. Sullivan’s account of the collision is as follows:

“And we had passed there [the dock at the ferry landing] perhaps— It seemed to me a minute and a half or two minutes, and suddenly saw a light on the port bow. I was not paying particular attention ahead, although looking that way. And I remarked to the pilot— I saw that it must be something unusual; there should be no light there. I remarked to the pilot, what did he suppose that was. I looked at him, and I saw he had reached for the bell and pushed the lever over; he recognized there was something in his way. I next saw the jib boom of the ship coming over the hurricane deck. This jib boom caught the light screen and the guy lines of the pilot house, then the side posts, and tore them out, and, of course, checked the boat’s speed in a measure; and, of course, the boat had been stopped. T will say, as soon as he saw the light, he rang the bell to stop. The boat drifted on by. [561]*561I told him to back the boat until the way was stopped, and I ran down below to see what happened. I went through the cabin, and saw that no one had been injured, or that no one had been knocked in the water; went down on the main deck; saw that the engines were not injured, the power was not disabled; went back to the speaking tube in the forward part of the boat, and told the pilot to turn around; told the pilot to go to Kalama, which he did. We were there only a few minutes. Very soon after leaving the ship, I noticed we ran into hazy weather again, or comparatively clear. I didn’t notice this in particular, as, of course, I was occupied more in looking after the people—found they were frightened—and in trying to calm them. Q. How far were you away when you first saw the lights in the Cypromene, captain? A. Well, it appeared to me about the length of the boat. Q. How long is the Hassalo? A. 180 feet, Q. Was it foggy at that time, or otherwise? A. It was very thick. Q. How long had it been thick that way, and how long had you been proceeding through thick fog? A. I have no means of telling; I would have no means of knowing; there was no object ahead to see, no object on the side.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodman v. Goodman
174 F. 644 (Fifth Circuit, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 F. 558, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-cypromene-ord-1905.