The Csr Group, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

The Csr Group, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc.

DecidedDecember 17, 2015

DocketA16D0146

StatusPublished

This text of The Csr Group, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc. (The Csr Group, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Csr Group, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 17, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0146. THE CSR GROUP, INC. et al. v. NIKE USA, INC.

The applicants have filed a “Motion to Change Filing Date,” asking this Court to enter an order changing the filing date of their application from November 20, 2015, to November 19, 2015. The respondents have moved to dismiss this application as untimely. Because we deem the application to have been timely filed on November 19, 2015, the applicants’ motion is DISMISSED as MOOT. The respondents’ motion to dismiss is DENIED. Upon review of the merits of the application, however, it is hereby DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/17/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 17, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0146. THE CSR GROUP, INC. et al. v. NIKE USA, INC.

The applicants have filed a “Motion to Change Filing Date,” asking this Court to enter an order changing the filing date of their application from November 20, 2015, to November 19, 2015. The respondents have moved to dismiss this application as untimely. Because we deem the application to have been timely filed on November 19, 2015, the applicants’ motion is DISMISSED as MOOT. The respondents’ motion to dismiss is DENIED. Upon review of the merits of the application, however, it is hereby DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/17/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

The Csr Group, Inc. v. Nike USA, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-csr-group-inc-v-nike-usa-inc-gactapp-2015.