the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. John Doe
This text of the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. John Doe (the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. John Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS Thirteenth District Corpus Christi – Edinburg, Texas
Below is the JUDGMENT in the numbered cause set out herein to be Filed and Entered in the Minutes of the Court of Appeals, Thirteenth District of Texas, at Corpus Christi – Edinburg, as of the 10th day of October, 2013. If this Judgment does not conform to the opinion handed down by the Court in this cause, any party may file a Motion for Correction of Judgment with the Clerk of this Court.
CAUSE NO. 13-13-00463-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 2012-DCL-140) THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, AND THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, Appellants, v. JOHN DOE, Appellee.
On appeal to this Court from Cameron County, Texas.
JUDGMENT
On petition for permissive appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, from an amended order signed August 2, 2013. Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam.
THIS CAUSE was submitted to the Court on September 5, 2013, on the petition for permissive appeal, the response, and the reply. These having been examined and fully considered, it is the opinion of the Court that the petition for permissive appeal should be denied. Accordingly, the petition for permissive appeal is hereby DENIED.
Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellants, THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, AND THE CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS. It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.
DORIAN E. RAMIREZ, CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, and the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. John Doe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-corporation-of-the-president-of-the-church-of-jesus-christ-of-texapp-2013.