The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio and Carl Berger v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents
304 F.2d 630, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 53, 133 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 618, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4955
Opinion
This appeal from the denial of a patent application is wholly without merit. The trial judge, in a de novo proceeding, patiently afforded appellants every opportunity to develop their case. But they failed to show that their frozen blood thawing process would produce the result claimed or be otherwise useful. Accordingly, we affirm on the opinion of the District Court. Commonwealth Engineering Co. v. Ladd, D. D.C., 199 F.Supp. 51.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio and Carl Berger v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents, 304 F.2d 630, 113 U.S. App. D.C. 53, 133 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 618, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4955 (D.C. Cir. 1962).
304 F.2d 630 (The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio and Carl Berger v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of Patents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry K. Puharich v. Edward J. Brenner
415 F.2d 979 (D.C. Circuit, 1969)
Schindler v. Commissioner of Patents
269 F. Supp. 630 (District of Columbia, 1967)
John Threatt v. United States
304 F.2d 630 (D.C. Circuit, 1962)