the City of Taft, Texas v. Dolores "Molly" R. Topper

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 31, 2009
Docket13-08-00464-CV
StatusPublished

This text of the City of Taft, Texas v. Dolores "Molly" R. Topper (the City of Taft, Texas v. Dolores "Molly" R. Topper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
the City of Taft, Texas v. Dolores "Molly" R. Topper, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00464-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

THE CITY OF TAFT, TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

DOLORES "MOLLY" R. TOPPER, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 156th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Hill1 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 156th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas, in cause number S-07-5734CV-B. Appellant has filed an

1 Retired Justice John Hill assigned to this Court by the Chief Justice of the Suprem e Court of Texas pursuant to the governm ent code. See T EX . G O V ’T C OD E A N N . §74.003 (Vernon 2005). unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the

appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX .

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 31st day of August, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
the City of Taft, Texas v. Dolores "Molly" R. Topper, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-city-of-taft-texas-v-dolores-molly-r-topper-texapp-2009.