Home/N.D. California/The City of Oakland

The City of Oakland

277 F. 969, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 980
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedJanuary 13, 1922
DocketNo. 17234
StatusPublished

This text of 277 F. 969 (The City of Oakland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The City of Oakland, 277 F. 969, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 980 (N.D. Cal. 1922).

Opinion

DOOLTXG, District Judge.

[1] Respondent was warned that its dredg-e was operating in the neighborhood of libelant’s cable and was likely to cut it. The warning was apparently unheeded. Either the dredge or the cable was out of its proper place. The cable was practically stationary, with a possible swing of SO feet. The dredge was moving. It is more likely that the dredge was out of place than that the cable was.

[2] A decree will therefore be entered for libelant. I am not sure that the action in rem may be maintained, but a decree in rem will be entered, so that the matter may be determined for the guidance of all of us.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 F. 969, 1922 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-city-of-oakland-cand-1922.