The City of New York v. . New York City Railway Company
96 N.E. 1112, 203 N.Y. 593, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 914
Opinion
Judgment in each action affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner and Collin, JJ. Vann and Chase, JJ., concur on the ground that the ordinance is unreasonable. Not sitting: Gray, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The City of New York v. . New York City Railway Company, 96 N.E. 1112, 203 N.Y. 593, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 914 (N.Y. 1911).
96 N.E. 1112 (The City of New York v. . New York City Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Weideman v. Newton Arms Co.
271 F. 302 (Second Circuit, 1921)