the City of Houston v. RiverCrest Civic Association

Court of Appeals of Texas

the City of Houston v. RiverCrest Civic Association

DecidedFebruary 22, 2007

Docket14-06-00638-CV

StatusPublished

This text of the City of Houston v. RiverCrest Civic Association (the City of Houston v. RiverCrest Civic Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

the City of Houston v. RiverCrest Civic Association, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellee=s Motion for Rehearing Granted; Opinion of November 30, 2006, Withdrawn; Vacated, Remanded, and Dismissed; and Substitute Opinion filed February 22, 2007

Appellee=s Motion for Rehearing Granted; Opinion of November 30, 2006, Withdrawn; Vacated, Remanded, and Dismissed; and Substitute Opinion filed February 22, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00638-CV

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

RIVERCREST CIVIC ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 858660

S U B S T I T U T E M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 16, 2006.

On November 20, 2006, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to the parties= agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. On November 30, 2006, this court granted the motion and issued an opinion, reversing the trial court=s judgment and remanding to the trial court for entry of judgment of dismissal with prejudice in accordance with the parties= agreement. Appellee subsequently filed a motion for rehearing, asking that we withdraw our opinion of November 30, 2006, and issue an opinion vacating the trial court=s judgment, remanding to the trial court for entry of judgment of dismissal with prejudice in accordance with the parties= agreement, and dismissing the appeal. We requested a response and appellant filed a response, reflecting no opposition

We grant appellee=s motion for rehearing.

Accordingly, the judgment is vacated, the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of judgment of dismissal with prejudice in accordance with the parties= agreement, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed February 22, 2007.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Hudson, and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellee=s Motion for Rehearing Granted; Opinion of November 30, 2006, Withdrawn; Vacated, Remanded, and Dismissed; and Substitute Opinion filed February 22, 2007

Appellee=s Motion for Rehearing Granted; Opinion of November 30, 2006, Withdrawn; Vacated, Remanded, and Dismissed; and Substitute Opinion filed February 22, 2007.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00638-CV

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

RIVERCREST CIVIC ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 858660

S U B S T I T U T E M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 16, 2006.

On November 20, 2006, the parties filed a joint motion to reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to the parties= agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. On November 30, 2006, this court granted the motion and issued an opinion, reversing the trial court=s judgment and remanding to the trial court for entry of judgment of dismissal with prejudice in accordance with the parties= agreement. Appellee subsequently filed a motion for rehearing, asking that we withdraw our opinion of November 30, 2006, and issue an opinion vacating the trial court=s judgment, remanding to the trial court for entry of judgment of dismissal with prejudice in accordance with the parties= agreement, and dismissing the appeal. We requested a response and appellant filed a response, reflecting no opposition

We grant appellee=s motion for rehearing.

Accordingly, the judgment is vacated, the cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of judgment of dismissal with prejudice in accordance with the parties= agreement, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Opinion filed February 22, 2007.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Hudson, and Guzman.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

the City of Houston v. RiverCrest Civic Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-city-of-houston-v-rivercrest-civic-association-texapp-2007.