the City of Houston, Texas v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
This text of the City of Houston, Texas v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (the City of Houston, Texas v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
June 30, 2006
Mr. Bertrand L. Pourteau II Senior Assistant City Attorney P.O. Box 1562 Houston, TX 77251-1562
Mr. Scott James Conrad SettlePou 3333 Lee Parkway, Eighth Floor Dallas, TX 75219 Mr. Michael D. Hudgins The Hudgins Law Firm 24 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1707 Houston, TX 77046
RE: Case Number: 04-0406 Court of Appeals Number: 14-03-00022-CV Trial Court Number: 2002-48557
Style: THE CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS v. CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC.
Dear Counsel:
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court and issued the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment. (Justice Wainwright, Justice Brister, and Justice Willett not sitting)
Sincerely, [pic] Andrew Weber, Clerk
by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk Enclosures |cc:|Mr. Charles | | |Bacarisse | | |Mr. Ed Wells |
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
the City of Houston, Texas v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-city-of-houston-texas-v-clear-channel-outdoor--tex-2006.