The City of El Paso, Texas Through the El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board v. Paseo Del Este Municipal Utility District No. 1

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ THE CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS through the EL PASO WATER UTILITIES PUBLIC § No. 08-24-00314-CV SERVICE BOARD, § Appeal from the Appellant, § 210th Judicial District Court v. § of El Paso County, Texas PASEO DEL ESTE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, § (TC#2021DCV3996) Appellee. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant City of El Paso, Texas through the El Paso Water Utilities Public Service Board

(EPWater) filed a notice of appeal on August 16, 2024, seeking to appeal an order signed on

March 12, 2024.1 The same day, the clerk of this Court sent a notice to EPWater indicating that

the appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction because the appeal appeared

untimely, unless the parties could show, within 20 days from the date of the notice, grounds to

continue the appeal.

Appellee Paseo Del Este Municipal Utility District No. 1 (Paseo) responded by filing a

motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. In the motion, Paseo states that the trial court

1 EPWater’s notice of appeal further stated that it desired to appeal from the March 12, 2024 order “including any rulings or orders subsumed therein or related thereto, including but not limited to the [trial] Court’s Order denying EPWater’s Motion for Reconsideration/Motion for New Trial, signed on August 13, 2024.” has not entered a final judgment or other appealable order in this case. EPWater responded to

Paseo’s motion with a motion to abate the appeal pending a final disposition in which it

acknowledges that the trial court has not issued a final judgment. Asserting that while “a final

judgment has not been entered yet, with reasonable diligence and cooperation that should occur

soon,” EPWater moves this Court to abate the appeal pursuant to Rule 27.2. Tex. R. App. P. 27.2

(authorizing appellate courts to “allow an appealed order that is not final to be modified so as to

be made final”).

EPWater also relies on Rule 27.1, which states that in a civil appeal, a prematurely filed

notice of appeal is effective to invoke appellate jurisdiction before the entry of a final appealable

order or judgment. Id. 27.1(a). However, “Rule 27.1 does not require this Court to docket and hold

an appeal open until there is an appealable judgment or order at some future date.” Ganesan v.

Reeves, 236 S.W.3d 816, 817 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, pet. denied) (raising concerns regarding

“too many uncertainties” and the “legislatively imposed performance measures for the timely

disposition of appeals” in determining that “Rule 27.1 does not contemplate an appellate place

holder until there is a final appealable judgment”).

Because there is no appealable order or judgment in this proceeding, we GRANT Paseo’s

motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal without prejudice to

refiling upon entry of a final judgment in the trial court. All other pending motions are denied as

moot.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

September 26, 2024

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.