the City of Austin v. Emily Poole, Lynne Shelton, and Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Parties Similarly Situated

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 30, 2015·No. 03-14-00638-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00638-CV

The City of Austin, Appellant

v.

Emily Poole, Lynne Shelton, and Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Parties Similarly Situated, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-09-002348, HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant The City of Austin, and appellees Emily Poole, Lynne Shelton, and

Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Parties Similarly Situated, have

notified this Court that they no longer wish to pursue this appeal and have filed an agreed motion

to dismiss it. We grant the parties’ motion and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed on Agreed Motion

Filed: October 30, 2015

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

the City of Austin v. Emily Poole, Lynne Shelton, and Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Parties Similarly Situated, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

the City of Austin v. Emily Poole, Lynne Shelton, and Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Parties Similarly Situated (the City of Austin v. Emily Poole, Lynne Shelton, and Mohit Taneja, Individually and as Representatives of All Other Parties Similarly Situated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.