The Cherokee Trust Funds

117 U.S. 288, 6 S. Ct. 718, 29 L. Ed. 880, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1840
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 1, 1886
Docket886
StatusPublished
Cited by42 cases

This text of 117 U.S. 288 (The Cherokee Trust Funds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Cherokee Trust Funds, 117 U.S. 288, 6 S. Ct. 718, 29 L. Ed. 880, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1840 (1886).

Opinion

117 U.S. 288 (1886)

THE CHEROKEE TRUST FUNDS.
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
v.
UNITED STATES AND CHEROKEE NATION, COMMONLY CALLED CHEROKEE NATION WEST.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued January 4, 5, 6, 1886.
Decided March 1, 1886.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS.

*290 Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Maury on behalf of the United States

Mr. Samuel Shellabarger and Mr. Jeremiah M. Wilson for appellants (Mr. Samuel J. Crawford and Mr. J.H. Gillpatrick were also on the brief, and Mr. W.T. Curtis was with them).

Mr. S.S. Burdett and Mr. William A. Phillips for appellees.

*293 MR. JUSTICE FIELD delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes before us on appeal from the Court of Claims. It was brought to determine the right of the petitioners, called the Eastern Band of the Cherokee Indians, to a proportionate part of two funds held by the United States in trust for the Cherokee Nation. One of the funds was created by the treaty with the Nation made December 29, 1835, at New Echota, in Georgia, commuting certain annuities into the sum of $214,000. The other arose from sales of certain lands of the Nation lying west of the Mississippi River.

The suit by the petitioners was authorized by an act of Congress, and it is brought against the United States and the Cherokee Nation. 22 Stat. 582, ch. 141. The United States, however, have no interest in the controversy, as they hold the funds merely as trustee. They stand neutral, therefore, in the litigation, although as a matter of form they have filed an answer traversing the allegations of the petition.

The general ground upon which the petitioners proceed and seek a recovery is, that the Cherokee Indians, both those residing east and those residing west of the Mississippi, formerly constituted one people and composed the Cherokee Nation; that by various treaty stipulations with the United States they became divided into two branches, known as the Eastern Cherokees and the Western Cherokees; and that the petitioners constitute a portion of the former, and as such are entitled to a proportionate share of the funds which the United States hold in trust for the Nation.

This claim is resisted upon the ground that the two branches, into which it is admitted the Nation was once divided, subsequently became reunited, and have ever since constituted one nation, known as the Cherokee Nation, and that as such it possesses *294 all the rights and property previously claimed by both, and that the petitioners have not, since the treaty of New Echota, constituted any portion of the Nation.

To determine the merits of the respective claims and pretensions of the parties, it will be necessary to give some account of the different treaties between the Cherokees and the United States, and to refer to the several laws passed by Congress to carry the treaties into effect, and accomplish the removal of the Indians from their former home east of the Mississippi to their present country west of that river.

When that portion of North America which is now embraced within the limits of the United States east of the Mississippi was discovered, it was occupied by different tribes or bands of Indians. These people were destitute of the primary arts of civilization, and with a few exceptions had no permanent buildings, occupying only huts and tents. Their lands were cultivated in small patches and generally by women. The men were chiefly engaged in hunting and fishing. From the chase came their principal food, and the skins of animals were their principal clothing. The different tribes roamed over large tracts and claimed a right to the country as their territory and hunting grounds. Of these tribes, the Cherokee Indians constituted one of the largest and most powerful. They claimed the principal part of the country now composing the States of North and South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and Tennessee. Their title was treated by the governments established by England, and the governments succeeding them, as merely usufructuary, affording protection against individual encroachment, but always subject to the control and disposition of those governments, at least so far as to prevent, without their consent, its acquisition by others. Such superior right rested upon the claim asserted by England of prior discovery of the country, and was respected by other European nations. There was no nation, therefore, to oppose this assertion of superior right to control the disposition of the lands, and to acquire the title of the Indians, except the Indians themselves; and by treaties with them from time to time their title and interest were ceded to the United States.

*295 On the 28th of November, 1785, the United States made their first treaty with the Cherokees. 7 Stat. 18. It was concluded at Hopewell, on the Keowee, between commissioners representing the United States on the one part and the "head men and warriors of all the Cherokees on the other." By it the Indians, for themselves and their respective tribes and towns, acknowledged that all the Cherokees were under the protection of the United States and of no other sovereign. The treaty promised peace to them and the favor and protection of the United States, on condition of the restoration to liberty of certain prisoners whom they had captured, and of the return of certain property which they had seized. It also prescribed the boundary between them and citizens of the United States of lands allotted to them for their hunting grounds. These lands embraced large tracts within the States mentioned. The ninth article provided that, for the benefit and comfort of the Indians, and for the prevention of injuries or oppressions on the part of the citizens or Indians, the United States should "have the sole and exclusive right of regulating the trade with the Indians and managing all their affairs in such manner as they think proper." By this treaty the Cherokees were recognized as one people, composing one tribe or nation, but subject, however, to the jurisdiction and authority of the Government of the United States, which could regulate their trade and manage all their affairs.

On the 2d of July, 1791, another treaty was made with the Cherokees, in which they were described as the "Cherokee Nation." 7 Stat. 39. Its representatives were designated as the "Chiefs and warriors of the Cherokee Nation of Indians," and the first article declared that "there shall be perpetual peace and friendship between all the citizens of the United States of America and all the individuals composing the whole Cherokee Nation of Indians." And the chiefs and warriors, "for themselves and all parts of the Cherokee Nation," acknowledged themselves and the Cherokee Nation to be under the protection of the United States and of no other sovereign. The treaty also renewed the agreement, on the part of the Cherokees, that the United States should have the sole and exclusive *296 right of regulating their trade; and readjusted the boundary between citizens of the United States and the "Cherokee Nation," by which the hunting grounds were reduced in quantity; and in consideration of this reduction the United States agreed to deliver certain valuable goods to the chiefs and warriors for the use of the Nation, and to pay to the Nation annually the sum of $1000. A further article increased the amount to $1500.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Genschow
645 F.3d 803 (Sixth Circuit, 2011)
Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Norton
389 F.3d 1074 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
Wichita & Affiliated Tribes v. Hodel
788 F.2d 765 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
Northern Paiute Nation v. United States
8 Cl. Ct. 470 (Court of Claims, 1985)
Wildcatt v. Smith
316 S.E.2d 870 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1984)
United States v. Felter
546 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Utah, 1982)
Weeks v. United States
406 F. Supp. 1309 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1975)
State Board of Public Welfare v. Board of Commissioners
137 S.E.2d 801 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Healing v. Jones
210 F. Supp. 125 (D. Arizona, 1962)
Whitefoot v. United States
293 F.2d 658 (Court of Claims, 1961)
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
281 F.2d 202 (Court of Claims, 1960)
Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. United States
165 F. Supp. 139 (Court of Claims, 1958)
Young v. Felornia
244 P.2d 862 (Utah Supreme Court, 1952)
United States v. Parton
46 F. Supp. 843 (W.D. North Carolina, 1942)
State v. . McAlhaney
17 S.E.2d 352 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 U.S. 288, 6 S. Ct. 718, 29 L. Ed. 880, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-cherokee-trust-funds-scotus-1886.