The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. One World Technologies, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. One World Technologies, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 944 F.3d 919
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 6, 2019·No. 18-2111·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC., Appellant

v.

ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DBA TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES POWER EQUIPMENT, Appellee ______________________

2018-2111 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00073. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JOHN A. DRAGSETH, Fish & Richardson P.C., Minneap- olis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT P. COURTNEY, MARIA ELENA STITELER; BENJAMIN ELACQUA, Houston, TX; KATHERINE VIDAL, MATTHEW R. MCCULLOUGH, MICHAEL RUECKHEIM, Winston & Strawn LLP, Menlo Park, CA.

JASON C. WHITE, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chi- cago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by WILLIAM R. PETERSON, Houston, TX; DION MICHAEL BREGMAN, AHREN CHRISTIAN HSU-HOFFMAN, MICHAEL JOHN LYONS, ALEXANDER STEIN, Palo Alto, CA; JULIE S. GOLDEMBERG, Philadelphia, PA. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 6, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. One World Technologies, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2019).

The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. One World Technologies, Inc. (The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. One World Technologies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.