The Boeing Company

CourtArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals
DecidedDecember 6, 2022
DocketASBCA No. 61387, 61388
StatusPublished

This text of The Boeing Company (The Boeing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Boeing Company, (asbca 2022).

Opinion

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of -- ) ) The Boeing Company ) ASBCA Nos. 61387, 61388 ) Under Contract No. F33657-01-D-0026 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Scott Felder, Esq. Scott M. McCaleb, Esq. Craig M. Smith, Esq. Wiley Rein LLP Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. Deputy Chief Trial Attorney David K. Stark, Esq. Joel B. Lofgren, Esq. Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The Settlement Agreement of the parties is attached as an exhibit to this Order. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: December 6, 2022

MICHAEL N. O’CONNELL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61387, 61388, Appeal of The Boeing Company, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated:

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals EXHIBIT MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

This Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”) is entered into by the U.S. Department of the Air Force (hereinafter “the Air Force”) and The Boeing Company (hereinafter “Boeing” or “the Contractor,” and, collectively with the Air Force, the “Parties”), as 17 November, 2022 (the “Effective Date”). of _____ WHEREAS, in 2015, the Air Force awarded Boeing Delivery Order 0138 under Boeing’s Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Eagle TALON Contract No. F33657-01-D-0026 for the Technology Maturation and Risk Reduction phase of the Air Force’s F-15 Eagle Passive Active Warning Survivability System (“EPAWSS”) program (the “TMRR Contract”); WHEREAS, in 2016, the Air Force awarded Boeing a separate contract, Contract No. FA8634-17-C-2650, for the follow-on Engineering and Manufacturing Development phase of the EPAWSS program to modify existing F-15 aircraft to ensure compatibility with the new EPAWSS system (“the EMD Contract,” and, together with the TMRR Contract, the “EPAWSS Contracts”); WHEREAS, Boeing submitted numerous non-commercial technical data deliverables to the Air Force under the EPAWSS Contracts with unlimited rights (the “EPAWSS Technical Data”); WHEREAS, Boeing marked the EPAWSS Technical Data with a proprietary marking to put third parties on notice that Boeing retained rights in the EPAWSS Technical Data (the “Disputed Legend”); WHEREAS, on July 31, 2017, the Air Force issued a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision (“COFD”) for each of the EPAWSS Contracts, directing the removal of the Disputed Legend under DFARS 252.227-7013, RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA—NONCOMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 1995), on the basis that the Disputed Legend was a nonconforming legend; WHEREAS, Boeing appealed both COFDs to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “Board”), designated as Appeal Nos. 61387 and 61388 (the “Appeals”); WHEREAS, Boeing requested entry of summary judgment on the question of whether Boeing may mark technical data in which it has given the Government unlimited rights with the Disputed Legend, which Boeing argued restricts the rights of third parties to use those data but expressly recognizes—and in no way impairs—the Government’s unlimited rights in those data; WHEREAS, the Air Force opposed summary judgment arguing: (1) the Disputed Legend does impede the Air Force’s unlimited rights to the technical data; (2) allowing contractors to mark technical data with non-authorized technical data rights legends adds unnecessary confusion and uncertainty; (3) it is undisputed that Boeing has chosen to use a legend that is not one of the authorized legends in the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”); and (4) Boeing’s concerns about other intellectual property rights that might be implicated are unrelated to the dispute at issue; WHEREAS, on November 29, 2018, the Board denied Boeing’s motion for summary judgment, holding that the markings in DFARS 252.227-7013(f) “are the only permissible legends for limiting data rights and no other data rights legends are allowed[;]”

1 of 5 WHEREAS, on March 18, 2019, the Board entered a final decision denying Boeing’s appeals; WHEREAS, Boeing appealed the denial of summary judgment and ensuing final decision to the Federal Circuit; WHEREAS, on December 21, 2020, the Federal Circuit issued a decision reversing the Board’s denial of summary judgment, vacating the final decision denying Boeing’s appeals, and remanding to the Board for further proceedings in the Appeals; WHEREAS, one issue remanded to the Board was whether the Disputed Legend does or does not restrict the Government’s rights; and WHEREAS, the Parties, to avoid the delay, expense, and uncertainty of further litigation, desire to settle the Appeals upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements of the Parties hereto, each to the other, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 1. The Air Force agrees that, for the purpose of compromise, the following legend is acceptable for and may be affixed to the non-commercial technical data delivered under the EPAWSS Contracts, including the current Contract No. FA8634-21-C-2702, with unlimited rights to notify third parties of Boeing’s continuing ownership of such deliverables (the “Permissible Third-Party Legend”): THE DATA HEREIN ARE NONCOMMERCIAL TECHNICAL DATA DELIVERED TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WITH UNLIMITED RIGHTS Contract No. Contractor Name The Boeing Company Contractor Address © [YYYY] Boeing. The technical data herein are owned by The Boeing Company. The U.S. Government authorizes non-U.S. Government recipients of these data to use these data for the performance of U.S. Government contracts or subcontracts. Any other third-party use of these data requires permission from the U.S. Government or The Boeing Company. 2. Except for the situation described below, Boeing shall be permitted, but not required, to remark previously delivered EPAWSS Technical Data by substituting the Permissible Third- Party Legend for the Disputed Legend. Regardless of whether or not Boeing remarks the previously delivered EPAWSS Technical Data, for the purposes of compromise, the Government shall accept all EPAWSS Technical Data that were rejected solely on the grounds that the data contained the Disputed Legend. In consideration of this acceptance, Boeing agrees that (a) the Air Force may attach the Permissible Cover Page (Attachment 1) to such rejected deliverables in its possession and (b) to the extent Boeing re-delivers the rejected deliverables, it will attach the Permissible Cover Page thereto. 2a. If any previously delivered EPAWSS Technical Data, or portion, is updated and redelivered to the Government by Boeing and is marked with a Disputed Legend, Boeing shall remark the data with the Permissible Third-Party Legend in lieu of the Disputed Legend. Boeing

2 of 5 shall not affix the Disputed Legend to any newly delivered or redelivered EPAWSS Technical Data. 3. Boeing agrees that the Permissible Third-Party Legend does not limit in any way the Government’s ability to fully exercise its unlimited rights “in any manner, and for any purpose whatsoever, and to have or authorize others to do so.” Boeing agrees the Government’s full exercise of its rights includes the right to retroactively grant permission to use. 4. To minimize further disagreements on this subject between the Parties and to improve consistency of markings, the Parties agree to consider use of the Permissible Third-Party Legend for non-commercial, unlimited rights technical data delivered under other contracts between the Parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
The Boeing Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-boeing-company-asbca-2022.