The Board of Trustees v. Noorda

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 15, 2020·No. 2:16-cv-00170·Unknown

Opinion

The Board of Trustees, in theircapacities as Case No.: 2:16-cv-00170-JAD-DJA Trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Fund, et al., OrderDismissing and Closing Case Plaintiffs and Directing Entry of Final Judgment v. Lamar Von Noorda, et al., Defendants On August 27, 2019, I granted in part and denied in part a motion to voluntarily dismiss this casebythe trustees of the National Roofing Industry Pension Fund and three other employee-benefit funds (the Trusts)1 with furtherdirections.2 I explained that, “[w]hen the court allows voluntary dismissal but rejects the proposed conditions, Rule 41(a)(2) provides the plaintiff with ‘a reasonable period of time within which eitherto refuse the conditional voluntary dismissal by withdrawing themotion for dismissal or to accept the dismissal despite the imposition of conditions.’”3 I further explained that, “[t]o the extent that the Trusts have conditioned their voluntary dismissal on the groundthat each party must pay their own attorneys’ fees and costs,theTrusts have until September 6, 2019, to withdraw their request for voluntary dismissal. Ifthey do not withdraw their voluntary dismissal by this deadline, the court will direct 1 The Trusts include the National Roofing Industry Pension Fund (Pension Fund), National Roofers Union Health and Welfare Fund (Welfare Fund), Roofers and Waterproofers Research and Education Joint Trust Fund, and Roofers Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund Local 162 for Clark, Esmeralda, Lincoln & Southern Nye Counties. 2 ECF No. 84. 3 Id. (quotingBeard v. Sheet Metal Workers Union, Local 150, 908 F.2d 474, 476 (9th Cir. 1990) (internal quotation marks omitted)). the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment of dismissal on terms consistent with this order and close this case.””* That September 6, 2019, deadline passed without any action by the Trusts or any other party to this case. Accordingly, with good cause appearing and no reason to delay, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL that states that final judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against defendants in the amount of $5,868.75 for the reasons stated in the court’s orders at ECF 8! Nos. 72 and 84, and CLOSE THIS CASE. Dated: January 15, 2020

U.S. District (ods Jennifer). Dorsey * Id. at 10-11 (emphasis deleted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Board of Trustees v. Noorda, (D. Nev. 2020).

The Board of Trustees v. Noorda (The Board of Trustees v. Noorda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related