The Bethlehem

E.D. Pennsylvania

The Bethlehem

298 F. 190, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1624

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 9, 1924

DocketNos. 151 and 152 of 1920 and 6, 10, 13, 15, 16, 35, 51, 90, and 110 of 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 298 F. 190 (The Bethlehem) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Bethlehem, 298 F. 190, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1624 (E.D. Pa. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, District Judge.

The exceptions of the United States as mortgagee raise the same questions as is the case of In re 'Steamship Northern Wave, 298 Fed. 188, and the facts are substantially identical. For the reasons set out in the opinion in that case, the exceptions are overruled, the report of the commissioner confirmed, and distribution of the fund awarded in accordance with his report.

An appropriate decree may be presented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, District Judge.

The exceptions of the United States as mortgagee raise the same questions as is the case of In re 'Steamship Northern Wave, 298 Fed. 188, and the facts are substantially identical. For the reasons set out in the opinion in that case, the exceptions are overruled, the report of the commissioner confirmed, and distribution of the fund awarded in accordance with his report.

An appropriate decree may be presented.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 F. 190, 1924 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-bethlehem-paed-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack