The Bertha F. Walker

220 F. 667, 136 C.C.A. 309, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2504
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJanuary 12, 1915
DocketNos. 95-97
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 220 F. 667 (The Bertha F. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Bertha F. Walker, 220 F. 667, 136 C.C.A. 309, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2504 (2d Cir. 1915).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These causes present only two questions, both wholly of fact, on testimony sharply conflicting and manifestly irreconcilable. We have carefully examined the whole testimony, and do not find in it sufficient to justify a reversal of the findings, on these two questions, of the District Judge, who saw, heard, and himself questioned the witnesses. Discussion of the evidence seems superfluous; it would contribute nothing illuminative of admiralty law or practice.

The decrees are affirmed, with interest and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Severance
152 F.2d 916 (Fourth Circuit, 1945)
Bouchard Transp. Co. v. Diamond P. Transp. Co.
10 F. Supp. 666 (E.D. New York, 1935)
The Pejepscot
10 F. Supp. 400 (E.D. New York, 1934)
The Buffalo
56 F.2d 738 (Second Circuit, 1932)
Greason, Son & Dalzell, Inc. v. Erie R.
56 F.2d 738 (Second Circuit, 1932)
The D., L. & W. No. 442
30 F.2d 250 (Second Circuit, 1929)
Scottish Nav. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line
60 F.2d 101 (S.D. New York, 1924)
Clyde Lighterage Co. v. Pennsylvania R.
258 F. 116 (Second Circuit, 1919)
The Colon
249 F. 460 (Second Circuit, 1918)
The Colon
241 F. 592 (S.D. New York, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 F. 667, 136 C.C.A. 309, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-bertha-f-walker-ca2-1915.