The Bertha F. Walker
This text of 220 F. 667 (The Bertha F. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These causes present only two questions, both wholly of fact, on testimony sharply conflicting and manifestly irreconcilable. We have carefully examined the whole testimony, and do not find in it sufficient to justify a reversal of the findings, on these two questions, of the District Judge, who saw, heard, and himself questioned the witnesses. Discussion of the evidence seems superfluous; it would contribute nothing illuminative of admiralty law or practice.
The decrees are affirmed, with interest and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
220 F. 667, 136 C.C.A. 309, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-bertha-f-walker-ca2-1915.