The Benjamin H. Whorford

290 F. 816, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1563
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedJune 25, 1923
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 290 F. 816 (The Benjamin H. Whorford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Benjamin H. Whorford, 290 F. 816, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1563 (E.D.N.Y. 1923).

Opinion

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a suit in admiralty to recover damages for the stranding of the bargés Benjamin H. Whorford, Edgar, Jr., and Eddie, alleged to have been caused by the steam tug Nathaniel P. Doane, and from damages alleged to have been caused to the .barge W. S. Alden by the steam tug Nathaniel P. Doane coming into collision with her.

[817]*817On the 30th day of September, 1920, the steam tug Nathaniel P. Doane was lying at New London Harbor, where she had been lying for some days because of the condition of the weather. The Nathaniel P. Doane had the choice of taking a tow east or a tow consisting of the four scows above named west, and the master of the said steam tug Nathaniel P. Doane determined to take one or the other of said tows on that day, and because of what he considered the greater dangers of going east he determined to take the above-mentioned tow, which was bound west, through Long Island Sound to New Haven, about a 12-hour trip from New London.

No storm warnings were displayed on the morning of September 30, 1920, at New London for about an hour after the Doane had left with her tow. The New York Herald called attention to the tropical storm that was moving northward, which the master of the Doane said he had never read. The Boston Globe and Boston American for September 29, 1920, did not give warning of a storm, but predicted fair and cooler weather and fresh southwest and west winds.

I do not believe that the master of the Doane read the weather reports in either the Boston Globe or Boston American, but it affirmatively appears that the barometer was steadily falling, and had been steadily falling for some days before September 30, 1920. It also appears that there were other steam tugs lying with tows on September 30, 1920, in the harbor at New London, which had been there for some days before September 30, 1920, and that none of those steam tugs left at or before the time alleged in this suit, except a Red Ball tug going east. The barometer, which had been steadily falling, indicated a storm, and the weather reports in the Boston Globe and Boston American warned of fresh west to southwest winds.

On the 30th day of September, 1920, at about 8:15 a. m., the said steam tug Nathaniel P. Doane left New London Harbor with said barges in tow, made up in tandem fashion, bound for New Haven, in the following order: The W. S. Alden being ahead, the Edgar, Jr., second, the Eddie third, and the Benjamin H. Whorford fourth. The said barges were all ordinary coal barges and light. The Doane had the tow on a hawser about 200 feet long and a bridle, and coming out of the harbor the barges were snuggpd up, but on reaching the Sound the barges dropped back apart about 60 or 75 feet, pursuant to agreement and according to custom, and were on fore and aft or corner lines supplied by the barges, running from the after corners of one barge to the forward corners of' the next barge.

The falling of the barometer before the Doane left New London with the tow, and the drizzling rain falling at the time of leaving, indicated a storm, although the sea was smooth, and there was a southerly wind and an easterly tide, which made the wind and tide against the Doane and her tow. The wind and sea increased as the Doane and her tow proceeded westward, and when about off the Cornfield Light the wind was blowing hard and the sea was getting heavy, and the indications of a storm were such that they could not have been mistaken by a man with the experience of the master of the Doane, and he had the opportunity to choose whether to return to New London, go into Duck Island Sound, or proceed.

[818]*818'' He chose the latter, course, and when near Falkner'Island the heavy ,sea caused the port line from the Edgar,. Jr., to the, W. S. Alden to part because of the strain imposed thereon by the three last barges¡ of the. tow. A new line was ¡rotten out and again the tow proceeded. About 3 o’clock p. m. it arrived to the north and east of Falkner Is¡land, and lay under the lea of the island until about 8 o’clock p. m;, when, the tide having turned to the westward and there being a .lull in the wind, the Doane again proceeded with her tow on her course.

The wind again began to blow heavily and the sea became high, and both wind and sea increased until the Doane with her tow was in the vicinity of Branford Reef, when a heavy squall caused the corner lines between the Edgar, Jr., and the Eddie to part, and the Eddie and the Benjamin H. Whorford to go adrift. I'he Doane succeeded in getting a hawser to these two barges ahd proceeded with her tow ; the W. S. Alden and the Edgar, Jr., on one hawser, and the Eddie and Benjamin H. Whorford on the other hawser. A short time afterward the Edgar, Jr., broke adrift, and the Doane succeeded in getting a line from her to this barge. Shortly thereafter the Benjamin H. Whorford again broke away, but the Doane succeeded in getting a line to her'. The Doane then proceeded with each barge on a separate line' from her. The wind continued to increase in strength, and the Doane and her tow -were well in toward the Connecticut shore.

When nearing New Haven a heavy squall struck the tow, and the barges Edgar-, Jr., Eddie, and Benjamin H. Whorford'broke .away and drifted into shoal water on the Connecticut shore, and the Doane was unable to pick them up. The W. S- Alden was still on the hawser from the tug. The parted lines from the other barges were dragging from the tug. The Doane tried to assist the other barges., and in maneuvering to make New Haven the barge W. S. Alden was brought in contact with the tug Doane and received injuries; The Doane then towed the Alden into New Haven. In the morning the Doane went out in search of the three barges which had gone adrift, and discovered them on the shore. . . ...

The tug Doane did all that she could to care for the tow after leaving Falkner Island, but the real question presented in this case is whether. the Doane was guilty of negligence in starting with the tow from.New London under the conditions prevailing at the time,.or was it an error of judgment? And again, was it negligence on the part of the Doane not to take the tow to a place of safety under the conditions prevailing when she reached Cornfield Light, or was it simply an error of judgment to continue on her course?

Much testimony was offered on the part of the Doane to show that it would have- been difficult to enter Duck Island Sound, and that -it would not have been a safe harbor for the Doane and her tow under the conditions prevailing at the time, of which I am not' convinced; but if these facts were true, and they must have been believed, by the master of' the Doane, then he was obliged to use more care in venturing on the voyage to New Haven, which -would take 12 hours under normal conditions, inasmuch as there would have beeti no harbor of refuge available, if overtaken by the storm which he should have-anticipated.

[819]*819Even if, in order to make Duck Island Sound, a safe refuge for the tow, it was necessary for each boat of the tow to anchor, I find that they were severally fully equipped with proper anchors and cables for that purpose. Falkner Island was not a harbor of refuge, because it would not have been possible to have remained where the Doane and her tow anchored for any length of time with a change of wind and tide.

.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

The Robert H. Smith
3 F. Supp. 531 (E.D. New York, 1933)
The Wyoming
58 F.2d 789 (D. Massachusetts, 1932)
The Mercury
291 F. 797 (D. Massachusetts, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
290 F. 816, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-benjamin-h-whorford-nyed-1923.