The Barter House, Inc. v. Infinity Spirits LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
THE BARTER HOUSE, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, 17 Civ. 9276 (PAE) ~ ORDER INFINITY SPIRITS LLC, et al., Defendants.
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On January 30, 2020, the Court ordered Hopkins to retain successor counsel for the corporate defendants and successor counsel to file a notice of appearance no later than February 14, 2020. Dkt. 331. No counsel has appeared. As stated in the January 30, 2020 Order, corporate defendants must be represented by counsel to proceed in this Court. See Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2007). As a result, plaintiffs’ counsel are at liberty to move for a default judgment against the corporate defendants. In light of the approaching trial date, the Court encourages plaintiffs’ counsel, in the event such an application is contemplated, to so file soon. SO ORDERED.
lon A. lanl A. Crplomaty United States District Judge Dated: February 28, 2020 New York, New York
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
The Barter House, Inc. v. Infinity Spirits LLC (The Barter House, Inc. v. Infinity Spirits LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.