The Bank of New York Mellon v. Holm Int'l Prop.'s, LLC

Nevada Supreme Court

The Bank of New York Mellon v. Holm Int'l Prop.'s, LLC

DecidedMay 11, 2017

Docket71319

StatusUnpublished

This text of The Bank of New York Mellon v. Holm Int'l Prop.'s, LLC (The Bank of New York Mellon v. Holm Int'l Prop.'s, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Bank of New York Mellon v. Holm Int'l Prop.'s, LLC, (Neb. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, No. 71319 F/K/A BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006- 006, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-006 (ERRONEOUSLY NAMED AS BANK FILED OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A BANK MAY 1 1 2017 OF NEW YORK), ELIZABETH A. BROWN Appellant, CLERIgF SUPREME COURT BY vs. TY.-4ELjEr‹.4 DEI:si

HOLM INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES, LLC, A UTAH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order granting a motion for summary judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge. When our initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, it appeared that the challenged order was not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because counterclaims against Shadow Wood Homeowners Association and Alessi and Koenig LLC remained pending in the district court. In response, appellant concedes that the claims against Alessi and Koenig remain pending in the district court. Respondent agrees that the claims against Alessi and Koenig LLC remain pending and also asserts that the claims SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1947A ev 17-1577S- against Shadow Wood remain pending. It thus appears that claims remain pending in the district court such that the district court has not yet entered a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 96 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). Appellant does not assert, and it does not appear, that the challenged order is otherwise appealable. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

6000r4 J.

J.

J. Pickering

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Janet Trost, Settlement Judge Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Mortenson & Rafie, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

'Given this order, we take no action on the motion to stay proceedings or for an extensionS of time to file the opening brief, filed on April 18, 2017.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (011 194/A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, No. 71319 F/K/A BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006- 006, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-006 (ERRONEOUSLY NAMED AS BANK FILED OF NEW YORK MELLON, F/K/A BANK MAY 1 1 2017 OF NEW YORK), ELIZABETH A. BROWN Appellant, CLERIgF SUPREME COURT BY vs. TY.-4ELjEr‹.4 DEI:si

HOLM INTERNATIONAL PROPERTIES, LLC, A UTAH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order granting a motion for summary judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge. When our initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, it appeared that the challenged order was not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because counterclaims against Shadow Wood Homeowners Association and Alessi and Koenig LLC remained pending in the district court. In response, appellant concedes that the claims against Alessi and Koenig remain pending in the district court. Respondent agrees that the claims against Alessi and Koenig LLC remain pending and also asserts that the claims SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1947A ev 17-1577S- against Shadow Wood remain pending. It thus appears that claims remain pending in the district court such that the district court has not yet entered a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 96 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). Appellant does not assert, and it does not appear, that the challenged order is otherwise appealable. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

6000r4 J.

J.

J. Pickering

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Janet Trost, Settlement Judge Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP/Las Vegas Mortenson & Rafie, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

'Given this order, we take no action on the motion to stay proceedings or for an extensionS of time to file the opening brief, filed on April 18, 2017.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (011 194/A

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

The Bank of New York Mellon v. Holm Int'l Prop.'s, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-bank-of-new-york-mellon-v-holm-intl-props-llc-nev-2017.

Opinion

J. Pickering

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack