The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Carl N. Peigh, Buel C. Griffin and Omar A. Safly

219 F.2d 764, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 83
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 17, 1955
Docket12225_1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 219 F.2d 764 (The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Carl N. Peigh, Buel C. Griffin and Omar A. Safly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Carl N. Peigh, Buel C. Griffin and Omar A. Safly, 219 F.2d 764, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 83 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff, entered on a jury’s verdict, in a suit for personal injuries. We reversed a former judgment for the defendant. Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 204 F.2d 391. The defendant’s contentions concern negligence, contributory negligence, proximate cause, and the admission and exclusion of evidence. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F.2d 764, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-baltimore-ohio-railroad-company-a-corporation-v-carl-n-peigh-buel-cadc-1955.