The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Carl N. Peigh, Buel C. Griffin and Omar A. Safly
This text of 219 F.2d 764 (The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Carl N. Peigh, Buel C. Griffin and Omar A. Safly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant appeals from a judgment for the plaintiff, entered on a jury’s verdict, in a suit for personal injuries. We reversed a former judgment for the defendant. Peigh v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 92 U.S.App.D.C. 198, 204 F.2d 391. The defendant’s contentions concern negligence, contributory negligence, proximate cause, and the admission and exclusion of evidence. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
219 F.2d 764, 95 U.S. App. D.C. 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-baltimore-ohio-railroad-company-a-corporation-v-carl-n-peigh-buel-cadc-1955.