The Atkins Hughes

Third Circuit

The Atkins Hughes

244 F. 149, 156 C.C.A. 577, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2007

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1917

DocketNo. 2249

StatusPublished

This text of 244 F. 149 (The Atkins Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Atkins Hughes, 244 F. 149, 156 C.C.A. 577, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2007 (3d Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It must be admitted that one rather perplexing circumstance in this case is the apparent lack of material injury to the schooner; but this cannot be allowed to outweigh the strong and positive testimony that she, and she alone, is the vessel that did the damage. We see no reason to add anything to Judge Thomson’s satisfactory opinion, and therefore adopt it as our own.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It must be admitted that one rather perplexing circumstance in this case is the apparent lack of material injury to the schooner; but this cannot be allowed to outweigh the strong and positive testimony that she, and she alone, is the vessel that did the damage. We see no reason to add anything to Judge Thomson’s satisfactory opinion, and therefore adopt it as our own.

The decree is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 F. 149, 156 C.C.A. 577, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-atkins-hughes-ca3-1917.