The Annie

S.D. New York

The Annie

133 F. 325, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 F. 325 (The Annie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

The Annie, 133 F. 325, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53 (S.D.N.Y. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

ADAMS, District Judge.

This action was brought by the libellants, Edward Jorgensen and Anthony Nelson, to recover wages claimed to be due at the rate of $30 per month from September 21st 1903, the date of their detention in St. Thomas, West Indies, to the 7th day of December following, when the vessel reached New Haven, Connecticut, her port of discharge, with penalties for non-payment amounting to $200 each. The defence is that the libellants refused to assist in discharging cargo, which it was their duty to do, and became intoxicated, disorderly, violent and insubordinate and were summoned before the United States Consul, before whom they had a hearing and were duly discharged in accordance with law.

The evidence shows that the men agreed in the shipping articles to handle all cargoes and ballast required. There was no trouble on the outward voyage but, on reaching St. Thomas, they refused to discharge cargo and altercations arose between the men and the officers of the vessel, which resulted in the master calling in the services of the United States Consul, who after a hearing discharged them for insubordination. The master thereupon paid the Consul the wages then due and took his receipt for them. To avoid further trouble the Consul detained the men while the vessel sailed.

The libellants have doubtless suffered some hardship from the Consul’s act but are not entitled, in view of their insubordinate conduct, to any redress from the vessel. The master’s act was fully justified and the libel must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ADAMS, District Judge.

This action was brought by the libellants, Edward Jorgensen and Anthony Nelson, to recover wages claimed to be due at the rate of $30 per month from September 21st 1903, the date of their detention in St. Thomas, West Indies, to the 7th day of December following, when the vessel reached New Haven, Connecticut, her port of discharge, with penalties for non-payment amounting to $200 each. The defence is that the libellants refused to assist in discharging cargo, which it was their duty to do, and became intoxicated, disorderly, violent and insubordinate and were summoned before the United States Consul, before whom they had a hearing and were duly discharged in accordance with law.

The evidence shows that the men agreed in the shipping articles to handle all cargoes and ballast required. There was no trouble on the outward voyage but, on reaching St. Thomas, they refused to discharge cargo and altercations arose between the men and the officers of the vessel, which resulted in the master calling in the services of the United States Consul, who after a hearing discharged them for insubordination. The master thereupon paid the Consul the wages then due and took his receipt for them. To avoid further trouble the Consul detained the men while the vessel sailed.

The libellants have doubtless suffered some hardship from the Consul’s act but are not entitled, in view of their insubordinate conduct, to any redress from the vessel. The master’s act was fully justified and the libel must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 F. 325, 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-annie-nysd-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack