The Annie Lord

251 F. 157, 1917 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 781
CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts
DecidedDecember 29, 1917
DocketNo. 1457
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 251 F. 157 (The Annie Lord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
The Annie Lord, 251 F. 157, 1917 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 781 (D. Mass. 1917).

Opinion

MORTON, District Judge.

This salvage case was heard in open court on December 18, 1917. At the conclusion of tire arguments I gave judgment orally, and said that I would put on file a formal memorandum of decision sufficient for the purposes of appeal.

The Annie Lord was a three-masted schooner. She sailed with a cargo of lumber from Windsor, N. S., for Fall River, Mass., about January 20, 1916. On or about February 19th following, she was knocked down by a sqüall and filled with water. She became waterlogged and unmanageable. The crew were driven on deck. In this condition she was found next day by the Flora L. Oliver in the early afternoon. The weather was severe, very cold, with a high wind and rough sea. The crew of the Lord had suffered considerably from exposure and were in a precarious situation; several of them were already frostbitten, and it is doubtful whether they would have survived the coming night without serious loss or injury. At the request of the master of the Annie Lord, the Oliver took off the crew. All, including the master, went to bed at once. Most of them stayed below until the Oliver- reached port, and none did any work. Those who were frost-bitten received such care and treatment as was possible under the circumstances.

The Annie Lord, at the time of the rescue, wás about 16 miles east-southeast of Thacher’s Island Light. The wind was strong from the west. Capt. Brown of the Oliver decided to try to tow the Lord into Boston. Five men from the Oliver accordingly went aboard the Lord put more sail on her, and endeavored to shape her course as well as they could. On account of her water-logged condition, and perhaps for other reasons, she did not mind her helm; but her course could be more or less altered by the trim of her sails. The work was so exposing and the weather so severe that the Oliver’s men found it impossible to stay long at a time on the' Lord and were frequently changed; but I do not gather that at the beginning of the tow the conditions were such as to involve any considerable danger to'men accustomed to the sea.

During the night the wind drew to the north and increased. The cold became more intense, and the sea reached a point described by Capt. Merriam, of the Lord, as “very rough.” The tow lines parted several times and were repaired. Finally, about 1:30 a. m., they again broke. There were no further, lines available, the weather was extremely bad, and the frost-bitten men of the Lord’s crew were apparently in need of medical attention. The master of the Oliver decided to give over the attempt to, tow the Lord into port. -At this time the vessels had reached a point about five or six miles to the northeast of Minot’s Ledge Light. It was a bad situation for the Lord if the wind should draw more to the northeast. Capt. Brown accordingly gave instructions to have the course of the Lord changed; she was headed straight off shore, and her sails were trimmed so as to give [159]*159her an easterly course. A signal lantern was hung in the Lord's rigging to warn other vessels, and two or three torches were lighted and placed on her decks for the same purpose, and to assist in identifying and locating her.

The Oliver then, not without difficulty, and perhaps some danger, look olí her men from the Lord and bore away for Gloucester, where; she arrived early the following forenoon. She was so badly iced up that it was impossible to work her sails, and she had to be towed into port. One of her crew testified that, in 40-odcl years at sea, it was the worst night within his experience. This is perhaps somewhat of an exaggeration, but I think there can be no doubt that it was a very severe time. Having arrived at Gloucester, most of the Lord’s men were sent to the hospital, where, however, they did not stay long; and Capt. Merriam, at the suggestion of Capt. Brown, went 1o the telephone, called up the custom,house, and arranged to have the United Otates revenue cutter Gresham, then in the port of Boston, notified to go out and pick up the Annie Lord. Capt. Brown testified that he was unable to do this himself because of the condition of his own vessel, which required his attention, and that it took his crew all that day and part of the next to get the íce off her, so that she was fit to go to sea. The Gresham, as a result of this notification, went out and found the Annie Lord near Peaked Hill Bars, off Cape Cod, took her in tow, and brought her into Boston, arriving here on tire following day. After the Lord was left by the Oliver, slie lost two of her masts and most of her deck cargo.

The Plora 1,. Oliver is a two-masted fishing schooner, about 105 feet long, and about 115 tons gross. At the time when she fell in with the Lord she was outward bound on a cod and halibut trip off the Nova Scotia coast, intended to last about, three weeks. She carried a crew of 17, besides the master. As a result of her salvage efforts, she destroyed gear worth about S130, and lost about five days’ Lime. Her value is not stated. The gross earnings of the Oliver on the trip which was interrupted by the salvage were about $1,000 a week. The parties agree that the value of the Lord was $1,500 on the vessel and $4,000 on the cargo, a total of $5,500. As to the foregoing facts there is not much controversy between the parties.

The real questions are whether the Oliver is entitled to any salvage, and, if so, to what amount. The respondent contends that the efforts of the Oliver, however praiseworthy, were unsuccessful, and did not in fact result in the saving of any property, and that therefore no salvage-can be awarded.

[1, 2] It is not necessary, in order to establish a claim to salvage, that the salvor should actually complete the work, of saving the property at risk. It is sufficient if he. endeavor to do so, and his efforts have a causal relation to the eventual preservation of it. In The Strathnevis (D. C.) 76 Fed. 855, 862, the salving steamer was unable to get the imperiled vessel into port, and was forced to leave her 60 miles off shore; but it was held that her services in towing the disabled vessel nearly 500 miles and bringing her nearer port, and in the way of passing vessels, were sufficient to entitle her to salvage. See, too, The, [160]*160Flottbek, 118 Fed. 954, 55 C. C. A. 448. In Adams v. Island City, 1 Clif. 210, Fed. Cas. No. 55 (in this district), the salving schooner endeavored to tow the wreck into port, but was unable to do so, and abandoned' the attempt, leaving the wreck anchored several miles off -shore and in a dangerous position. The schooner, on arriving in port, gave notice of the location and dangerous situation of the wreck, and help was sent to it. It was held that the schooner was entitled to salvage. In The Samuel Hubbard (District Court, Massachusetts), 229 Fed. 843, where a fishing schooner put men on an unmanageable derelict, and then went on tq_port and sent out a tug, which towed the derelict in, it was held that the schooner was entitled to salvage amounting to $1,675, on a total valuation of property saved amounting to $5,300. Putting men on the derelict did not assist in the actual salvage.

In the present case, as things turned out, the work done in towing the Ford from the position off Thacher’s Island to that off Minot’s Fight neither helped nor hindered in the final result. The cause of the Annie Ford’s being saved was the message brought into port by the Oliver and communicated to the Gresham. In order to do this, the Oliver temporarily abandoned the voyage that she was on and returned to port. It is true that Capt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Iowa Fleeting Service, Inc. v. Eckstein
211 F. Supp. 2d 794 (M.D. Louisiana, 2002)
Hernandez v. Roberts
675 F. Supp. 1329 (S.D. Florida, 1988)
Hener v. United States
525 F. Supp. 350 (S.D. New York, 1981)
Nadle v. M/V TEQUILA
377 F. Supp. 414 (S.D. New York, 1974)
Conolly v. S.S. Karina II
302 F. Supp. 675 (E.D. New York, 1969)
Dize v. Steel Barge Beverly
247 F. Supp. 968 (E.D. Virginia, 1965)
Petition of Esso Shipping Co.
122 F. Supp. 133 (S.D. Texas, 1954)
Atlantic Transport Co. v. United States
42 F.2d 583 (Court of Claims, 1930)
The Professor Koch
260 F. 969 (D. Massachusetts, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 F. 157, 1917 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/the-annie-lord-mad-1917.